Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes

Introduction. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) is used as a marker of endogenous insulin secretion. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of UCPCR for distinguishing between type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and non-T1DM (monogenic diabetes and T2DM) and predicting therapeutic choices in type 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanai Wang, Ying Gao, Xiaoling Cai, Ling Chen, Lingli Zhou, Yumin Ma, Siqian Gong, Xueyao Han, Linong Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1747684
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850166208299532288
author Yanai Wang
Ying Gao
Xiaoling Cai
Ling Chen
Lingli Zhou
Yumin Ma
Siqian Gong
Xueyao Han
Linong Ji
author_facet Yanai Wang
Ying Gao
Xiaoling Cai
Ling Chen
Lingli Zhou
Yumin Ma
Siqian Gong
Xueyao Han
Linong Ji
author_sort Yanai Wang
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) is used as a marker of endogenous insulin secretion. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of UCPCR for distinguishing between type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and non-T1DM (monogenic diabetes and T2DM) and predicting therapeutic choices in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Methods. Twenty-three patients with genetically confirmed monogenic diabetes (median age 35.0 years (interquartile range 30.0-47.0), 13 (56.5%) men), 56 patients with T1DM (median age 46.0 years (interquartile range 26.5-59.5), 28 (50.0%) men), 136 patients with T2DM (median age 53.0 years (interquartile range 42.0-60.0), 87 (64.0%) men), and 59 healthy subjects (median age 36.0 years (30.0-42.0), 26 (44.1%) men) were included. UCPCR was collected in the morning. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify optimal UCPCR cut-off values to differentiate T1DM from non-T1DM. This UCPCR cut-off was used to divide T2DM patients into two groups, and the two groups were compared. Results. The UCPCR was lower in patients with T1DM compared with T2DM, monogenic diabetes, and healthy subjects, while the UCPCR was similar in T2DM and monogenic diabetes. A UCPCR cut-off of ≥0.21 nmol/mmol distinguished between monogenic diabetes and T1DM (area under the curve [AUC], 0.949) with 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity. UCPCR≥0.20 nmol/mmol had 82% sensitivity and 93% specificity for distinguishing between T2DM and T1DM, with an AUC of 0.932. UCPCR was not reliable for distinguishing between monogenic diabetes and T2DM (AUC, 0.605). Twenty-five of 136 (18.4%) T2DM patients had UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol. Compared with T2DM patients with a UCPCR>0.20 nmol/mmol, T2DM patients with UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol had a lower serum C-peptide (fasting C-peptide, 0.39 nmol/L vs. 0.66 nmol/L, P<0.001; postprandial C-peptide, 0.93 nmol/L vs. 1.55 nmol/L, P<0.001), lower BMI (22.8 kg/m2 vs. 25.2 kg/m2, P=0.006), and higher percentage of insulin or secretagogue therapy (92.0% vs. 59.5%, P=0.002). Conclusions. UCPCR is a practical and noninvasive marker that can distinguish between TIDM and T2DM or monogenic diabetes. UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol reflects severe impaired beta cell function and the need for insulin or secretagogue therapy in T2DM patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-dda5d8f2fa7a4d1494a9c7c504c3a17e
institution OA Journals
issn 2314-6745
2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-dda5d8f2fa7a4d1494a9c7c504c3a17e2025-08-20T02:21:30ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67452314-67532019-01-01201910.1155/2019/17476841747684Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of DiabetesYanai Wang0Ying Gao1Xiaoling Cai2Ling Chen3Lingli Zhou4Yumin Ma5Siqian Gong6Xueyao Han7Linong Ji8Departments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaDepartments of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, ChinaIntroduction. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) is used as a marker of endogenous insulin secretion. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of UCPCR for distinguishing between type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and non-T1DM (monogenic diabetes and T2DM) and predicting therapeutic choices in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Methods. Twenty-three patients with genetically confirmed monogenic diabetes (median age 35.0 years (interquartile range 30.0-47.0), 13 (56.5%) men), 56 patients with T1DM (median age 46.0 years (interquartile range 26.5-59.5), 28 (50.0%) men), 136 patients with T2DM (median age 53.0 years (interquartile range 42.0-60.0), 87 (64.0%) men), and 59 healthy subjects (median age 36.0 years (30.0-42.0), 26 (44.1%) men) were included. UCPCR was collected in the morning. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify optimal UCPCR cut-off values to differentiate T1DM from non-T1DM. This UCPCR cut-off was used to divide T2DM patients into two groups, and the two groups were compared. Results. The UCPCR was lower in patients with T1DM compared with T2DM, monogenic diabetes, and healthy subjects, while the UCPCR was similar in T2DM and monogenic diabetes. A UCPCR cut-off of ≥0.21 nmol/mmol distinguished between monogenic diabetes and T1DM (area under the curve [AUC], 0.949) with 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity. UCPCR≥0.20 nmol/mmol had 82% sensitivity and 93% specificity for distinguishing between T2DM and T1DM, with an AUC of 0.932. UCPCR was not reliable for distinguishing between monogenic diabetes and T2DM (AUC, 0.605). Twenty-five of 136 (18.4%) T2DM patients had UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol. Compared with T2DM patients with a UCPCR>0.20 nmol/mmol, T2DM patients with UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol had a lower serum C-peptide (fasting C-peptide, 0.39 nmol/L vs. 0.66 nmol/L, P<0.001; postprandial C-peptide, 0.93 nmol/L vs. 1.55 nmol/L, P<0.001), lower BMI (22.8 kg/m2 vs. 25.2 kg/m2, P=0.006), and higher percentage of insulin or secretagogue therapy (92.0% vs. 59.5%, P=0.002). Conclusions. UCPCR is a practical and noninvasive marker that can distinguish between TIDM and T2DM or monogenic diabetes. UCPCR≤0.20 nmol/mmol reflects severe impaired beta cell function and the need for insulin or secretagogue therapy in T2DM patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1747684
spellingShingle Yanai Wang
Ying Gao
Xiaoling Cai
Ling Chen
Lingli Zhou
Yumin Ma
Siqian Gong
Xueyao Han
Linong Ji
Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
Journal of Diabetes Research
title Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
title_full Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
title_fullStr Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
title_short Clinical Implications of Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Different Types of Diabetes
title_sort clinical implications of urinary c peptide creatinine ratio in patients with different types of diabetes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1747684
work_keys_str_mv AT yanaiwang clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT yinggao clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT xiaolingcai clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT lingchen clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT linglizhou clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT yuminma clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT siqiangong clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT xueyaohan clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes
AT linongji clinicalimplicationsofurinarycpeptidecreatinineratioinpatientswithdifferenttypesofdiabetes