Comparison of Conventional and Digital Impression Methods for Measuring Mesiodistal Teeth Dimensions: An Analytical Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: We aim to determine and compare the correlation between conventional and digital impression methods for measuring mesiodistal teeth dimensions. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on a total of 120 dental arch samples with less than 5 mm of tooth crowding, comp...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Lam Nguyen Le, Khanh Phuong Vu Le |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Dental Hypotheses |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/dhyp/fulltext/2024/15020/comparison_of_conventional_and_digital_impression.2.aspx |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown diameters of permanent teeth
by: Ozge Uslu-Akcam, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Comparison of Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques in Full-Arch Edentulous Implant Patients: An In Vitro Study
by: Tran Hung Lam, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown size and height of deciduous teeth from a tooth bank in Brazil
by: Taciana Emília de Almeida Anfe, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Predicting the Mesiodistal Crown Dimensions of the Permanent First Molars from the Deciduous Second Molars
by: Dunia Ahmed Al-Dulaimy, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Digital Versus Conventional Impressions
by: Mohammad Munthir Abdulrazzaq, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01)