Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study

There is limited evidence regarding the retention of essential basic science knowledge among dental students and professionals. Understanding the anatomy of the skull, osteology, is crucial as it provides the structural framework essential for comprehending head anatomy, where various soft tissue co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noora Helene Thune, Anna Tostrup Kristensen, Qalbi Khan, Tor Paaske Utheim, Hugo Lewi Hammer, Amer Sehic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1596610/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849421703973699584
author Noora Helene Thune
Noora Helene Thune
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Qalbi Khan
Qalbi Khan
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Hugo Lewi Hammer
Amer Sehic
Amer Sehic
author_facet Noora Helene Thune
Noora Helene Thune
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Qalbi Khan
Qalbi Khan
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Hugo Lewi Hammer
Amer Sehic
Amer Sehic
author_sort Noora Helene Thune
collection DOAJ
description There is limited evidence regarding the retention of essential basic science knowledge among dental students and professionals. Understanding the anatomy of the skull, osteology, is crucial as it provides the structural framework essential for comprehending head anatomy, where various soft tissue components are organized. This study aims to evaluate and compare the retention of osteological knowledge across different stages of dental education and professional practice. Specific anatomical structures on selected skull bones and the complete cranium, taught at the pre-clinical level and including clinically and radiographically significant landmarks, were marked for assessment. The study evaluated the ability of second year and fifth year undergraduate dental students, as well as postgraduate students at various stages of specialist training in different dental fields, to independently identify these marked anatomical structures. The study demonstrated significantly higher identification accuracy among second year students compared to fifth year and postgraduate students (p < 0.05). Second year students achieved over 90% accuracy for individual skull bones, with slightly lower accuracy for the entire cranium (85.9%). Fifth year students showed markedly lower retention, with accuracy below 50%, ranging from 20.8% (cranium) to 48.3% (mandible). Postgraduate students performed similarly to fifth year students, notably with only 11.8% accuracy for the sphenoid bone. Significant differences in accuracy were observed among postgraduate specialties (p < 0.05), with oral surgery and oral medicine specialists achieving the highest accuracy (81.2% for the mandible). However, no significant correlation between years of experience and accuracy was observed among the postgraduate groups (p = 0.45). Our results indicate that clinically and radiologically relevant anatomical knowledge is better retained over time, while overall osteological knowledge significantly declines. This highlights the need for strategies beyond initial learning to enhance long-term retention. Integrating clinical, radiological, and surface anatomy into continuing dental education could substantially improve knowledge retention. Furthermore, our findings suggest potential benefits from increased vertical integration and encourage broader discussion regarding the traditional separation between pre-clinical and clinical training phases.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd82c4e9de3f4c7ab5104b621b8b6d3b
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-4915
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Dental Medicine
spelling doaj-art-dd82c4e9de3f4c7ab5104b621b8b6d3b2025-08-20T03:31:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Dental Medicine2673-49152025-06-01610.3389/fdmed.2025.15966101596610Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative studyNoora Helene Thune0Noora Helene Thune1Anna Tostrup Kristensen2Anna Tostrup Kristensen3Qalbi Khan4Qalbi Khan5Tor Paaske Utheim6Tor Paaske Utheim7Tor Paaske Utheim8Hugo Lewi Hammer9Amer Sehic10Amer Sehic11Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayFaculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, NorwayInstitute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayInstitute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayThere is limited evidence regarding the retention of essential basic science knowledge among dental students and professionals. Understanding the anatomy of the skull, osteology, is crucial as it provides the structural framework essential for comprehending head anatomy, where various soft tissue components are organized. This study aims to evaluate and compare the retention of osteological knowledge across different stages of dental education and professional practice. Specific anatomical structures on selected skull bones and the complete cranium, taught at the pre-clinical level and including clinically and radiographically significant landmarks, were marked for assessment. The study evaluated the ability of second year and fifth year undergraduate dental students, as well as postgraduate students at various stages of specialist training in different dental fields, to independently identify these marked anatomical structures. The study demonstrated significantly higher identification accuracy among second year students compared to fifth year and postgraduate students (p < 0.05). Second year students achieved over 90% accuracy for individual skull bones, with slightly lower accuracy for the entire cranium (85.9%). Fifth year students showed markedly lower retention, with accuracy below 50%, ranging from 20.8% (cranium) to 48.3% (mandible). Postgraduate students performed similarly to fifth year students, notably with only 11.8% accuracy for the sphenoid bone. Significant differences in accuracy were observed among postgraduate specialties (p < 0.05), with oral surgery and oral medicine specialists achieving the highest accuracy (81.2% for the mandible). However, no significant correlation between years of experience and accuracy was observed among the postgraduate groups (p = 0.45). Our results indicate that clinically and radiologically relevant anatomical knowledge is better retained over time, while overall osteological knowledge significantly declines. This highlights the need for strategies beyond initial learning to enhance long-term retention. Integrating clinical, radiological, and surface anatomy into continuing dental education could substantially improve knowledge retention. Furthermore, our findings suggest potential benefits from increased vertical integration and encourage broader discussion regarding the traditional separation between pre-clinical and clinical training phases.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1596610/fullanatomybasic sciencescraniumclinical dentistryknowledge retention
spellingShingle Noora Helene Thune
Noora Helene Thune
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Anna Tostrup Kristensen
Qalbi Khan
Qalbi Khan
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Tor Paaske Utheim
Hugo Lewi Hammer
Amer Sehic
Amer Sehic
Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
Frontiers in Dental Medicine
anatomy
basic sciences
cranium
clinical dentistry
knowledge retention
title Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
title_full Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
title_fullStr Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
title_short Retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education: a comparative study
title_sort retention of skull anatomy knowledge in dental education a comparative study
topic anatomy
basic sciences
cranium
clinical dentistry
knowledge retention
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1596610/full
work_keys_str_mv AT noorahelenethune retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT noorahelenethune retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT annatostrupkristensen retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT annatostrupkristensen retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT qalbikhan retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT qalbikhan retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT torpaaskeutheim retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT torpaaskeutheim retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT torpaaskeutheim retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT hugolewihammer retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT amersehic retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy
AT amersehic retentionofskullanatomyknowledgeindentaleducationacomparativestudy