Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i><b>:</b> The study aimed to evaluate a newly designed semicircular implant for the fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To determine its strength and clinical applicabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmet Burak Satılmış, Ahmet Ülker, Zafer Uzunay, Tolgahan Cengiz, Abdurrahim Temiz, Mustafa Yaşar, Tansel Mutlu, Uygar Daşar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/110
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588025588088832
author Ahmet Burak Satılmış
Ahmet Ülker
Zafer Uzunay
Tolgahan Cengiz
Abdurrahim Temiz
Mustafa Yaşar
Tansel Mutlu
Uygar Daşar
author_facet Ahmet Burak Satılmış
Ahmet Ülker
Zafer Uzunay
Tolgahan Cengiz
Abdurrahim Temiz
Mustafa Yaşar
Tansel Mutlu
Uygar Daşar
author_sort Ahmet Burak Satılmış
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives</i><b>:</b> The study aimed to evaluate a newly designed semicircular implant for the fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To determine its strength and clinical applicability, the new implant was compared biomechanically with conventional fixation methods, such as lateral locking plate fixation and a plate combined with cerclage wires. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Fifteen synthetic femur models were used in this biomechanical study. A Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic fracture was simulated by osteotomy 5 mm distal to the femoral stem. The models were divided into three groups: Group I (lateral locking plate fixation), Group II (lateral locking plate with cerclage wires), and Group III (new semicircular implant system). All fixation methods were subjected to axial loading, lateral bending, and torsional force testing using an MTS biomechanical testing device. Failure load and displacement were measured to assess stability. <i>Results</i>: The semicircular implant (Group III) demonstrated a significantly higher failure load (778.8 ± 74.089 N) compared to the lateral plate (Group I: 467 ± 68.165 N) and plate with cerclage wires (Group II: 652.4 ± 65.474 N; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The new implant also exhibited superior stability under axial, lateral bending, and torsional forces. The failure load for Group III was more robust, with fractures occurring at the screw level rather than plate or screw detachment. <i>Conclusions</i>: Compared to traditional fixation methods, the newly designed semicircular implant demonstrated superior biomechanical performance in stabilizing Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. It withstood higher physiological loads, offered better structural stability, and could be an alternative to existing fixation systems in clinical practice. Further studies, including cadaveric and in vivo trials, are recommended to confirm these results and assess the long-term clinical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd75d0b1ec3e4961a01f82d7f61b7f0c
institution Kabale University
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-dd75d0b1ec3e4961a01f82d7f61b7f0c2025-01-24T13:40:39ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442025-01-0161111010.3390/medicina61010110Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical StudyAhmet Burak Satılmış0Ahmet Ülker1Zafer Uzunay2Tolgahan Cengiz3Abdurrahim Temiz4Mustafa Yaşar5Tansel Mutlu6Uygar Daşar7Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taşköprü State Hospital, Kastamonu 37400, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, Mersin 33110, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicalpark Adana Hospital, Adana 01060, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taşköprü State Hospital, Kastamonu 37400, TurkeyDepartment of Industrial Design Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük 78050, TurkeyDepartment of Industrial Design Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük 78050, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicalpark Gebze Hospital, Kocaeli 41400, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Karabük University, Karabük 78050, Turkey<i>Background and Objectives</i><b>:</b> The study aimed to evaluate a newly designed semicircular implant for the fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To determine its strength and clinical applicability, the new implant was compared biomechanically with conventional fixation methods, such as lateral locking plate fixation and a plate combined with cerclage wires. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Fifteen synthetic femur models were used in this biomechanical study. A Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic fracture was simulated by osteotomy 5 mm distal to the femoral stem. The models were divided into three groups: Group I (lateral locking plate fixation), Group II (lateral locking plate with cerclage wires), and Group III (new semicircular implant system). All fixation methods were subjected to axial loading, lateral bending, and torsional force testing using an MTS biomechanical testing device. Failure load and displacement were measured to assess stability. <i>Results</i>: The semicircular implant (Group III) demonstrated a significantly higher failure load (778.8 ± 74.089 N) compared to the lateral plate (Group I: 467 ± 68.165 N) and plate with cerclage wires (Group II: 652.4 ± 65.474 N; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The new implant also exhibited superior stability under axial, lateral bending, and torsional forces. The failure load for Group III was more robust, with fractures occurring at the screw level rather than plate or screw detachment. <i>Conclusions</i>: Compared to traditional fixation methods, the newly designed semicircular implant demonstrated superior biomechanical performance in stabilizing Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. It withstood higher physiological loads, offered better structural stability, and could be an alternative to existing fixation systems in clinical practice. Further studies, including cadaveric and in vivo trials, are recommended to confirm these results and assess the long-term clinical outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/110new generationimplantperiprosthetic fracturesfracture fixationbiomechanicship arthroplasty
spellingShingle Ahmet Burak Satılmış
Ahmet Ülker
Zafer Uzunay
Tolgahan Cengiz
Abdurrahim Temiz
Mustafa Yaşar
Tansel Mutlu
Uygar Daşar
Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
Medicina
new generation
implant
periprosthetic fractures
fracture fixation
biomechanics
hip arthroplasty
title Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
title_full Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
title_fullStr Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
title_full_unstemmed Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
title_short Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
title_sort multiplanar semicircular new generation implant system developed for proximal femur periprosthetic fractures a biomechanical study
topic new generation
implant
periprosthetic fractures
fracture fixation
biomechanics
hip arthroplasty
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/110
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmetburaksatılmıs multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT ahmetulker multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT zaferuzunay multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT tolgahancengiz multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT abdurrahimtemiz multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT mustafayasar multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT tanselmutlu multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT uygardasar multiplanarsemicircularnewgenerationimplantsystemdevelopedforproximalfemurperiprostheticfracturesabiomechanicalstudy