Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review
The paper delivers an overview of the literature concerning the adaption of Topology Optimisation (TO) to the Strut-and-Tie Method (STM). In the beginning, the foundations and basics of STM are briefly summarised. STM is a practical implementation of the lower bound theory of plasticity for reinforc...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Polish Academy of Sciences
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Archives of Civil Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.pan.pl/Content/135371/PDF/19_1k.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850219374997143552 |
|---|---|
| author | Sławomir Dudziak |
| author_facet | Sławomir Dudziak |
| author_sort | Sławomir Dudziak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The paper delivers an overview of the literature concerning the adaption of Topology Optimisation (TO) to the Strut-and-Tie Method (STM). In the beginning, the foundations and basics of STM are briefly summarised. STM is a practical implementation of the lower bound theory of plasticity for reinforced concrete (RC). It is generally used to design so-called D-regions (i.e. Discontinuity caused by irregular geometry or concentrated load) working under the complex stress state. These regions are modelled with the equivalent truss consisting of struts (representing the flow of compressive forces carried by concrete), ties (representing rebar) and nodes. The STM algorithm’s most demanding part is determining the layout of the truss, which correctly reflects force flow in a specific D-region. During this stage, TO methods can eliminate the designer’s arbitrary decisions. Analysed literature sources are divided into two groups differing in the adopted TO algorithms: the former uses layout optimisation procedures for trusses, whereas the latter uses TO methods for continuum domains. In the first approach, the equivalent truss is obtained explicitly as an outcome of the TO phase. In the second approach, the material continuum material layout is an inspiration for the ST model or is post-processed with image analysis methods and possibly shape optimisation methods to obtain bending-free bar structures. The advantages and limitations of both approaches are put forward in the conclusion section. Further development in this field is very likely, so future prospects are also anticipated. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dd14c07bc43a416e8cb6e940f76bbf08 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1230-2945 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Polish Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Archives of Civil Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-dd14c07bc43a416e8cb6e940f76bbf082025-08-20T02:07:23ZengPolish Academy of SciencesArchives of Civil Engineering1230-29452025-06-01vol. 71No 2295311https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.154122Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a reviewSławomir Dudziak0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6287-2005Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Al. Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warsaw, PolandThe paper delivers an overview of the literature concerning the adaption of Topology Optimisation (TO) to the Strut-and-Tie Method (STM). In the beginning, the foundations and basics of STM are briefly summarised. STM is a practical implementation of the lower bound theory of plasticity for reinforced concrete (RC). It is generally used to design so-called D-regions (i.e. Discontinuity caused by irregular geometry or concentrated load) working under the complex stress state. These regions are modelled with the equivalent truss consisting of struts (representing the flow of compressive forces carried by concrete), ties (representing rebar) and nodes. The STM algorithm’s most demanding part is determining the layout of the truss, which correctly reflects force flow in a specific D-region. During this stage, TO methods can eliminate the designer’s arbitrary decisions. Analysed literature sources are divided into two groups differing in the adopted TO algorithms: the former uses layout optimisation procedures for trusses, whereas the latter uses TO methods for continuum domains. In the first approach, the equivalent truss is obtained explicitly as an outcome of the TO phase. In the second approach, the material continuum material layout is an inspiration for the ST model or is post-processed with image analysis methods and possibly shape optimisation methods to obtain bending-free bar structures. The advantages and limitations of both approaches are put forward in the conclusion section. Further development in this field is very likely, so future prospects are also anticipated.https://journals.pan.pl/Content/135371/PDF/19_1k.pdfstrut-and-tie methodreinforced concretetopology optimisationreinforcement layout optimisation |
| spellingShingle | Sławomir Dudziak Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review Archives of Civil Engineering strut-and-tie method reinforced concrete topology optimisation reinforcement layout optimisation |
| title | Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review |
| title_full | Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review |
| title_fullStr | Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review |
| title_short | Application of topology optimisation in the strut-and-tie method: a review |
| title_sort | application of topology optimisation in the strut and tie method a review |
| topic | strut-and-tie method reinforced concrete topology optimisation reinforcement layout optimisation |
| url | https://journals.pan.pl/Content/135371/PDF/19_1k.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sławomirdudziak applicationoftopologyoptimisationinthestrutandtiemethodareview |