Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar
The importance of a comparative study of social partnership and social dialogue arises from several key factors. In today's society, the regulation of labor relations, the protection of workers' rights, and the maintenance of social stability are critical issues. Both social partnership an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zaporizhzhia National University
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Менеджмент та підприємництво: тренди розвитку |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://management-journal.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/581/316 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850165542592184320 |
|---|---|
| author | Iryna Shavkun Yana Dybchynska |
| author_facet | Iryna Shavkun Yana Dybchynska |
| author_sort | Iryna Shavkun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The importance of a comparative study of social partnership and social dialogue arises from several key factors. In today's society, the regulation of labor relations, the protection of workers' rights, and the maintenance of social stability are critical issues. Both social partnership and social dialogue play a vital role in facilitating agreements between the state, employers, and employees.
The purpose of comparing these two mechanisms is to identify their similarities and differences, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of each mechanism in regulating social and labor relations.
The study's specific objectives include:
defining the essence and key features by exploring the concepts, functions, and principles of social partnership and social dialogue;
identifying similarities and differences by analyzing interaction mechanisms, regulatory instruments, and the levels of their application;
evaluating effectiveness by assessing the influence of social partnership and social dialogue on social stability, workers' rights protection, and labor market development;
exploring international experience by reviewing successful practices in various countries to identify and potentially implement the most effective approaches.
The methodology of the study involves scientific approaches, methods, and principles for analyzing social partnership and social dialogue.
systemic approach views social partnership and social dialogue as components of the broader social and labor relations system, highlighting their interconnections and influence on society;
comparative approach helps to identify the similarities and differences between social partnership and social dialogue across various countries, industries, and legal systems;
institutional approach investigates the role of state and non-state institutions in the formation and evolution of social partnership and social dialogue;
functional approach focuses on the functions that social partnership and social dialogue serve in regulating labor and social relations.
Overall, the study confirms that social partnership and social dialogue are important instruments for regulating social and labor relations, but their effectiveness depends on specific economic and political conditions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dd0bbfd47e784f9fabba8ff379bb3fe6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2522-1566 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Zaporizhzhia National University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Менеджмент та підприємництво: тренди розвитку |
| spelling | doaj-art-dd0bbfd47e784f9fabba8ff379bb3fe62025-08-20T02:21:42ZengZaporizhzhia National UniversityМенеджмент та підприємництво: тренди розвитку2522-15662025-06-01232728210.26661/2522-1566/2025-2/32-05Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiarIryna Shavkun0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-9754Yana Dybchynska1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-7326Zaporizhzhia National University, UkraineZaporizhzhia National University, UkraineThe importance of a comparative study of social partnership and social dialogue arises from several key factors. In today's society, the regulation of labor relations, the protection of workers' rights, and the maintenance of social stability are critical issues. Both social partnership and social dialogue play a vital role in facilitating agreements between the state, employers, and employees. The purpose of comparing these two mechanisms is to identify their similarities and differences, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of each mechanism in regulating social and labor relations. The study's specific objectives include: defining the essence and key features by exploring the concepts, functions, and principles of social partnership and social dialogue; identifying similarities and differences by analyzing interaction mechanisms, regulatory instruments, and the levels of their application; evaluating effectiveness by assessing the influence of social partnership and social dialogue on social stability, workers' rights protection, and labor market development; exploring international experience by reviewing successful practices in various countries to identify and potentially implement the most effective approaches. The methodology of the study involves scientific approaches, methods, and principles for analyzing social partnership and social dialogue. systemic approach views social partnership and social dialogue as components of the broader social and labor relations system, highlighting their interconnections and influence on society; comparative approach helps to identify the similarities and differences between social partnership and social dialogue across various countries, industries, and legal systems; institutional approach investigates the role of state and non-state institutions in the formation and evolution of social partnership and social dialogue; functional approach focuses on the functions that social partnership and social dialogue serve in regulating labor and social relations. Overall, the study confirms that social partnership and social dialogue are important instruments for regulating social and labor relations, but their effectiveness depends on specific economic and political conditions.https://management-journal.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/581/316social partnershipsocial dialoguecorporatismneo-corporatismtripartismbipartism |
| spellingShingle | Iryna Shavkun Yana Dybchynska Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar Менеджмент та підприємництво: тренди розвитку social partnership social dialogue corporatism neo-corporatism tripartism bipartism |
| title | Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar |
| title_full | Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar |
| title_fullStr | Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar |
| title_short | Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar |
| title_sort | social dialogue and social partnership similar and peculiar |
| topic | social partnership social dialogue corporatism neo-corporatism tripartism bipartism |
| url | https://management-journal.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/581/316 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT irynashavkun socialdialogueandsocialpartnershipsimilarandpeculiar AT yanadybchynska socialdialogueandsocialpartnershipsimilarandpeculiar |