Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism

Quentin Skinner and a group of writers and professors of so called Cambridge School have had an undeniable role in critical rereading of history of European thought and reprinting some of the classical texts of modern political thought. Skinner, in his enormous hermeneutical studies, linking the con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reza Najafzadeh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2018-09-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3557_ddccc343d93f2d97dbf569790882c29a.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543868236955648
author Reza Najafzadeh
author_facet Reza Najafzadeh
author_sort Reza Najafzadeh
collection DOAJ
description Quentin Skinner and a group of writers and professors of so called Cambridge School have had an undeniable role in critical rereading of history of European thought and reprinting some of the classical texts of modern political thought. Skinner, in his enormous hermeneutical studies, linking the contextualist approach to the intentionalist view, shows that the established values of today’s life style and our thinking about the values reflect a set of selections that we have made through the different historical times and possibilities. The contentious history of modern concept of liberty is such a case. Skinner puts the theory of civic liberty against the liberalism believing that the ideological triumph of liberalism in nineteenth degraded the republican cause of liberty. The republican tradition is one of the Skinner’s fields of archeological rediscovery, and surveying the trajectory of Roman political thought and analyzing historical roots of neo-Roman theory of Liberty are a part of the project of rediscovering the English republican tradition. Then, in a reductionary historicism, Skinner’s archeological hermeneutic is an English one, and his research program focused on the modern British history of liberty. His conservative archeology could not go beyond a mere historiography of thought and it is difficult to find in his project a critical position and also a philosophical examination in the field of politics. Skinner is a conservative Foucauldian.
format Article
id doaj-art-dcfb993d9af049a3a6644bc42434c392
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-dcfb993d9af049a3a6644bc42434c3922025-01-13T05:30:46ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502018-09-011862712913557Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before LiberalismReza Najafzadeh0Assistant Professor of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti UniversityQuentin Skinner and a group of writers and professors of so called Cambridge School have had an undeniable role in critical rereading of history of European thought and reprinting some of the classical texts of modern political thought. Skinner, in his enormous hermeneutical studies, linking the contextualist approach to the intentionalist view, shows that the established values of today’s life style and our thinking about the values reflect a set of selections that we have made through the different historical times and possibilities. The contentious history of modern concept of liberty is such a case. Skinner puts the theory of civic liberty against the liberalism believing that the ideological triumph of liberalism in nineteenth degraded the republican cause of liberty. The republican tradition is one of the Skinner’s fields of archeological rediscovery, and surveying the trajectory of Roman political thought and analyzing historical roots of neo-Roman theory of Liberty are a part of the project of rediscovering the English republican tradition. Then, in a reductionary historicism, Skinner’s archeological hermeneutic is an English one, and his research program focused on the modern British history of liberty. His conservative archeology could not go beyond a mere historiography of thought and it is difficult to find in his project a critical position and also a philosophical examination in the field of politics. Skinner is a conservative Foucauldian.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3557_ddccc343d93f2d97dbf569790882c29a.pdfpolitical thoughtquentin skinnerrepublicanismneo-roman theory of libertymonarchismliberalism
spellingShingle Reza Najafzadeh
Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
political thought
quentin skinner
republicanism
neo-roman theory of liberty
monarchism
liberalism
title Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
title_full Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
title_fullStr Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
title_full_unstemmed Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
title_short Historiography of Neo-Roman Thought: Critical Review of Skinner’s Liberty before Liberalism
title_sort historiography of neo roman thought critical review of skinner s liberty before liberalism
topic political thought
quentin skinner
republicanism
neo-roman theory of liberty
monarchism
liberalism
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3557_ddccc343d93f2d97dbf569790882c29a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rezanajafzadeh historiographyofneoromanthoughtcriticalreviewofskinnerslibertybeforeliberalism