Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi

Abstract Background Cervical cancer screening is an essential public health intervention, and critical to meeting the Global Strategy for Cervical Cancer Elimination goals – yet most women in low- and middle-income countries are never screened. There is a need to understand context-specific factors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corrina Moucheraud, Symon Chibaka, Ginger Golub, Pericles Kalande, Amos Makwaya, Eric Ochieng, Vitalis Ogutu, Khumbo Phiri, Sam Phiri, Risa M. Hoffman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23143-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704019886342144
author Corrina Moucheraud
Symon Chibaka
Ginger Golub
Pericles Kalande
Amos Makwaya
Eric Ochieng
Vitalis Ogutu
Khumbo Phiri
Sam Phiri
Risa M. Hoffman
author_facet Corrina Moucheraud
Symon Chibaka
Ginger Golub
Pericles Kalande
Amos Makwaya
Eric Ochieng
Vitalis Ogutu
Khumbo Phiri
Sam Phiri
Risa M. Hoffman
author_sort Corrina Moucheraud
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cervical cancer screening is an essential public health intervention, and critical to meeting the Global Strategy for Cervical Cancer Elimination goals – yet most women in low- and middle-income countries are never screened. There is a need to understand context-specific factors that facilitate or prevent women from engaging in screening. Methods This analysis leverages data collected in 2022–2023 from a national mobile phone-based survey in Kenya and from a household survey conducted in three districts of Malawi. Informed by the Health Belief Model, we assess whether women’s reported cervical cancer screening history (ever or never screened) was associated with their perceived susceptibility (awareness of cervical cancer risk factors), perceived severity (knowing someone who was affected by cervical cancer), perceived barriers (access to services), perceived benefits (trust in information about cervical cancer prevention), self-efficacy (engagement in other preventive health behaviors), and cues to action (speaking with others about cervical cancer prevention). Results Ever-screening for cervical cancer was reported by 49.7% of the 736 Kenyan respondents and 42.5% of the 261 Malawian respondents. There were few associations between women’s demographic or socioeconomic characteristics and screening history. The strongest associations were seen for cues to action (women who had spoken about cervical cancer with health workers had 1.88 the adjusted risk ratio for screening in Kenya [95% CI 1.59, 2.24] and 1.89 the adjusted risk in Malawi [95% CI 1.41, 2.54] compared to women who never had these conversations); and for knowing someone who had, or who had died due to, cervical cancer (aRR 1.34 and 1.30 respectively in Kenya, and aRR 2.03 and 1.46 respectively in Malawi). In both countries, self-efficacy was also associated with screening, as was perceived severity in both countries (i.e., knowing someone who had, or who had died due to cervical cancer, which was reported by many Kenyan and Malawian respondents). In Kenya, knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors was also associated with women’s screening history, as was access to other preventive health services in Malawi. Conclusions These results suggest promising areas for interventions aiming to increase cervical cancer screening in these contexts: encouraging health workers to discuss screening with eligible women, leveraging women’s peers who have been affected by cervical cancer, and promoting screening during other preventive health services.
format Article
id doaj-art-dccece5c6fab456bb1a20eea51e9b9dd
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-dccece5c6fab456bb1a20eea51e9b9dd2025-08-20T03:16:56ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-05-0125111210.1186/s12889-025-23143-yFactors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and MalawiCorrina Moucheraud0Symon Chibaka1Ginger Golub2Pericles Kalande3Amos Makwaya4Eric Ochieng5Vitalis Ogutu6Khumbo Phiri7Sam Phiri8Risa M. Hoffman9School of Global Public Health, New York UniversityChildren in the WildernessInnovations for Poverty ActionPartners in HopePartners in HopeInnovations for Poverty ActionInnovations for Poverty ActionPartners in HopePartners in HopeDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of CaliforniaAbstract Background Cervical cancer screening is an essential public health intervention, and critical to meeting the Global Strategy for Cervical Cancer Elimination goals – yet most women in low- and middle-income countries are never screened. There is a need to understand context-specific factors that facilitate or prevent women from engaging in screening. Methods This analysis leverages data collected in 2022–2023 from a national mobile phone-based survey in Kenya and from a household survey conducted in three districts of Malawi. Informed by the Health Belief Model, we assess whether women’s reported cervical cancer screening history (ever or never screened) was associated with their perceived susceptibility (awareness of cervical cancer risk factors), perceived severity (knowing someone who was affected by cervical cancer), perceived barriers (access to services), perceived benefits (trust in information about cervical cancer prevention), self-efficacy (engagement in other preventive health behaviors), and cues to action (speaking with others about cervical cancer prevention). Results Ever-screening for cervical cancer was reported by 49.7% of the 736 Kenyan respondents and 42.5% of the 261 Malawian respondents. There were few associations between women’s demographic or socioeconomic characteristics and screening history. The strongest associations were seen for cues to action (women who had spoken about cervical cancer with health workers had 1.88 the adjusted risk ratio for screening in Kenya [95% CI 1.59, 2.24] and 1.89 the adjusted risk in Malawi [95% CI 1.41, 2.54] compared to women who never had these conversations); and for knowing someone who had, or who had died due to, cervical cancer (aRR 1.34 and 1.30 respectively in Kenya, and aRR 2.03 and 1.46 respectively in Malawi). In both countries, self-efficacy was also associated with screening, as was perceived severity in both countries (i.e., knowing someone who had, or who had died due to cervical cancer, which was reported by many Kenyan and Malawian respondents). In Kenya, knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors was also associated with women’s screening history, as was access to other preventive health services in Malawi. Conclusions These results suggest promising areas for interventions aiming to increase cervical cancer screening in these contexts: encouraging health workers to discuss screening with eligible women, leveraging women’s peers who have been affected by cervical cancer, and promoting screening during other preventive health services.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23143-yCervical cancer screeningKenyaMalawi
spellingShingle Corrina Moucheraud
Symon Chibaka
Ginger Golub
Pericles Kalande
Amos Makwaya
Eric Ochieng
Vitalis Ogutu
Khumbo Phiri
Sam Phiri
Risa M. Hoffman
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
BMC Public Health
Cervical cancer screening
Kenya
Malawi
title Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
title_full Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
title_fullStr Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
title_short Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi
title_sort factors associated with cervical cancer screening results from cross sectional surveys in kenya and malawi
topic Cervical cancer screening
Kenya
Malawi
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23143-y
work_keys_str_mv AT corrinamoucheraud factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT symonchibaka factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT gingergolub factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT pericleskalande factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT amosmakwaya factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT ericochieng factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT vitalisogutu factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT khumbophiri factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT samphiri factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi
AT risamhoffman factorsassociatedwithcervicalcancerscreeningresultsfromcrosssectionalsurveysinkenyaandmalawi