Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

Introduction Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of death in children under 5 years old globally (591 000 deaths reported in 2016). Over 95% of deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is estimated that two-thirds of the congenital anomaly health burden could b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosni Salem, Na Eun Kim, Dominique Vervoot, Ahmad Hammouri, Cristiana Riboni, Caris Grimes, Naomi Jane Wright
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-01
Series:BMJ Paediatrics Open
Online Access:https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000755.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850065002933780480
author Hosni Salem
Na Eun Kim
Dominique Vervoot
Ahmad Hammouri
Cristiana Riboni
Caris Grimes
Naomi Jane Wright
author_facet Hosni Salem
Na Eun Kim
Dominique Vervoot
Ahmad Hammouri
Cristiana Riboni
Caris Grimes
Naomi Jane Wright
author_sort Hosni Salem
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of death in children under 5 years old globally (591 000 deaths reported in 2016). Over 95% of deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is estimated that two-thirds of the congenital anomaly health burden could be averted through surgical intervention and that such interventions can be cost-effective. This systematic review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs.Methods and analysis A systematic literature review will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar, African Journals OnLine and Regional WHO’s African Index Medicus databases for articles on the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs. The following search strings will be used: (1) congenital anomalies; (2) LMICs; and (3) cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions. Articles will be uploaded to Covidence software, duplicates removed and the remaining articles screened by two independent reviewers. Cost information for interventions or procedures will be extracted by country and condition. Outcome measurements by reported unit and cost-effectiveness ratios will be extracted. Methodological quality of each article will be assessed using the Drummond checklist for economic evaluations. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Effective Health Care Program guidance will be followed to assess the grade of the studies.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for conducting the systematic review. There will be no direct collection of data from individuals. The finalised article will be published in a scientific journal for dissemination. The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews).Conclusion Congenital anomalies form a large component of the global health burden that is amenable to surgical intervention. This study will systematically review the current literature on the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020172971.
format Article
id doaj-art-dcb7572a63874da2a26d9aaee0420ba1
institution DOAJ
issn 2399-9772
language English
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Paediatrics Open
spelling doaj-art-dcb7572a63874da2a26d9aaee0420ba12025-08-20T02:49:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Paediatrics Open2399-97722020-02-014110.1136/bmjpo-2020-000755Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocolHosni Salem0Na Eun Kim1Dominique Vervoot2Ahmad Hammouri3Cristiana Riboni4Caris Grimes5Naomi Jane Wright66 Cairo University, Giza, Egypt1 Department of General Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA3 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA4 Department of Internal Medicine, Bethlehem Arab Society for Rehabilitation, Bethlehem, Palestine, State of5 University of Pavia, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy2 King`s College London, London, UKKing`s Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, King`s College London, London, UKIntroduction Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of death in children under 5 years old globally (591 000 deaths reported in 2016). Over 95% of deaths occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is estimated that two-thirds of the congenital anomaly health burden could be averted through surgical intervention and that such interventions can be cost-effective. This systematic review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs.Methods and analysis A systematic literature review will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar, African Journals OnLine and Regional WHO’s African Index Medicus databases for articles on the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs. The following search strings will be used: (1) congenital anomalies; (2) LMICs; and (3) cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions. Articles will be uploaded to Covidence software, duplicates removed and the remaining articles screened by two independent reviewers. Cost information for interventions or procedures will be extracted by country and condition. Outcome measurements by reported unit and cost-effectiveness ratios will be extracted. Methodological quality of each article will be assessed using the Drummond checklist for economic evaluations. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Effective Health Care Program guidance will be followed to assess the grade of the studies.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for conducting the systematic review. There will be no direct collection of data from individuals. The finalised article will be published in a scientific journal for dissemination. The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews).Conclusion Congenital anomalies form a large component of the global health burden that is amenable to surgical intervention. This study will systematically review the current literature on the cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in LMICs.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020172971.https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000755.full
spellingShingle Hosni Salem
Na Eun Kim
Dominique Vervoot
Ahmad Hammouri
Cristiana Riboni
Caris Grimes
Naomi Jane Wright
Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
BMJ Paediatrics Open
title Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
title_full Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
title_short Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
title_sort cost effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low income and middle income countries a systematic review protocol
url https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000755.full
work_keys_str_mv AT hosnisalem costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT naeunkim costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT dominiquevervoot costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ahmadhammouri costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT cristianariboni costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT carisgrimes costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT naomijanewright costeffectivenessofneonatalsurgeryforcongenitalanomaliesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewprotocol