Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
<h4>Background</h4>A COS represents an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials of a specific condition. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative aims to collate and stimulate the development and application of COS, by...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, Jane M Blazeby, Douglas G Altman, Paula R Williamson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146444 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
by: Katherine Davis, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
by: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)