On Trying to Teach Judgment
What does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bond University
2001-01-01
|
| Series: | Legal Education Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6138 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849687019143299072 |
|---|---|
| author | Douglas N Frenkel |
| author_facet | Douglas N Frenkel |
| author_sort | Douglas N Frenkel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | What does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvious historical and descriptive connotations. Few would deny, of course, that lawyers have traditionally been considered “professionals” or that, in the minds of many, this designation carries with it certain normative implications about the relationship between lawyers and society that links the “legal profession” to the small number of other occupational groups (for example, doctors) that are also considered professionals. What has become quite controversial, however, is whether these normative claims are either true or, if true, socially desirable. Moreover, even among those who believe that the concept has some independent normative value worth preserving, the claim that “professionalism” can be taught remains deeply controversial. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dc9f856a0a8648fb9a58bbaf0cb85cb7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1033-2839 1839-3713 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2001-01-01 |
| publisher | Bond University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Legal Education Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-dc9f856a0a8648fb9a58bbaf0cb85cb72025-08-20T03:22:29ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132001-01-0112110.53300/001c.6138On Trying to Teach JudgmentDouglas N FrenkelWhat does it mean to be a “professional?” The question lies at the heart of any attempt to teach professional ethics. Yet, despite its undeniable centrality, there is remarkably little consensus among the current generation of legal ethics teachers about what this term actually means beyond its obvious historical and descriptive connotations. Few would deny, of course, that lawyers have traditionally been considered “professionals” or that, in the minds of many, this designation carries with it certain normative implications about the relationship between lawyers and society that links the “legal profession” to the small number of other occupational groups (for example, doctors) that are also considered professionals. What has become quite controversial, however, is whether these normative claims are either true or, if true, socially desirable. Moreover, even among those who believe that the concept has some independent normative value worth preserving, the claim that “professionalism” can be taught remains deeply controversial.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6138 |
| spellingShingle | Douglas N Frenkel On Trying to Teach Judgment Legal Education Review |
| title | On Trying to Teach Judgment |
| title_full | On Trying to Teach Judgment |
| title_fullStr | On Trying to Teach Judgment |
| title_full_unstemmed | On Trying to Teach Judgment |
| title_short | On Trying to Teach Judgment |
| title_sort | on trying to teach judgment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6138 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasnfrenkel ontryingtoteachjudgment |