Evaluating Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Impact of Ozanimod on Processing Speed Using BICAMS

Abstract Introduction Cognitive dysfunction represents a major burden in multiple sclerosis (MS). The impact on cognitive outcomes of ozanimod in real-world settings remains to be fully elucidated. Methods In this single-center observational study, we evaluated cognitive performance in 67 patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurora Zanghì, Paola Sofia Di Filippo, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D’Amico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2025-05-01
Series:Neurology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-025-00736-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Cognitive dysfunction represents a major burden in multiple sclerosis (MS). The impact on cognitive outcomes of ozanimod in real-world settings remains to be fully elucidated. Methods In this single-center observational study, we evaluated cognitive performance in 67 patients with MS (74.6% female) receiving ozanimod (mean treatment duration 17.7 ± 3.0 months). Cognitive assessment was performed using the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery, comprising Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) collected at different time points. Results Analysis suggested significant improvement in SDMT Z-scores (mean improvement 0.337, SD 0.638; Cohen’s d = 0.42, p = 0.00031). Baseline SDMT Z-score emerged as the sole significant predictor of cognitive change (coefficient − 0.345, p < 0.001), accounting for 32.4% of variance. CVLT-II and BVMT-R scores remained stable across time points. Conclusions This real-world study suggests that ozanimod treatment is associated with significant improvement in information processing speed, independent of traditional prognostic factors. These findings complement existing clinical trial data and warrant further investigation through larger, multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods to validate these cognitive benefits.
ISSN:2193-8253
2193-6536