Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases
The proliferation of open repositories offering georeferenced occurrences on biodiversity has boosted the use of species distribution models (SDMs). However, the need of presence-only records from these repositories yields a substantial limitation due to sampling biases, which can introduce uncertai...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Ecological Informatics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004588 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850249791241453568 |
|---|---|
| author | Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez Salvador Arenas-Castro Juan P. González-Varo Pablo González-Moreno |
| author_facet | Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez Salvador Arenas-Castro Juan P. González-Varo Pablo González-Moreno |
| author_sort | Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The proliferation of open repositories offering georeferenced occurrences on biodiversity has boosted the use of species distribution models (SDMs). However, the need of presence-only records from these repositories yields a substantial limitation due to sampling biases, which can introduce uncertainty and skew SDM predictions. Furthermore, most predictions rely only on non-spatial metrics such as the AUC and the TSS to evaluate model performance. These metrics may not adequately account for spatially biased predictions, whereas the use of spatially explicit metrics could be more informative. Here, the effectiveness of both non-spatial and spatially explicit metrics is evaluated in response to predictions affected by sampling biases. Using SDMs, the distribution of 31 fleshy-fruited plants was predicted as a case study with contrasting settings to generate pseudo-absences and sampling bias corrections. Then, the performance of predictions was assessed with two non-spatial and three alternative, spatially explicit metrics. Predictions were affected by substantial sampling biases, particularly from West to East. Significant discrepancies were found between non-spatial and spatially explicit metrics. The non-spatial metrics failed to detect predictions affected by sampling biases, often yielding higher scores for less reliable predictions. In contrast, spatially explicit metrics benefited the implementation of bias corrections. Moreover, the method to generate pseudo-absences was more influential in determining spatial differences between predictions than either the bias correction or the geographical characteristics of input occurrences. Overall, our findings reveal the utility of spatially explicit metrics as a complementary tool to evaluate SDMs affected by sampling biases. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dbf458094359446d9fcb8865562d7f42 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1574-9541 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecological Informatics |
| spelling | doaj-art-dbf458094359446d9fcb8865562d7f422025-08-20T01:58:24ZengElsevierEcological Informatics1574-95412024-12-018410291610.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102916Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biasesClaudio A. Bracho-Estévanez0Salvador Arenas-Castro1Juan P. González-Varo2Pablo González-Moreno3Department of Biology, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Campus Río San Pedro, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain; Corresponding author.Area of Ecology, Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, SpainDepartment of Biology, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Campus Río San Pedro, Puerto Real, Cádiz, SpainDepartment of Forest Engineering, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, SpainThe proliferation of open repositories offering georeferenced occurrences on biodiversity has boosted the use of species distribution models (SDMs). However, the need of presence-only records from these repositories yields a substantial limitation due to sampling biases, which can introduce uncertainty and skew SDM predictions. Furthermore, most predictions rely only on non-spatial metrics such as the AUC and the TSS to evaluate model performance. These metrics may not adequately account for spatially biased predictions, whereas the use of spatially explicit metrics could be more informative. Here, the effectiveness of both non-spatial and spatially explicit metrics is evaluated in response to predictions affected by sampling biases. Using SDMs, the distribution of 31 fleshy-fruited plants was predicted as a case study with contrasting settings to generate pseudo-absences and sampling bias corrections. Then, the performance of predictions was assessed with two non-spatial and three alternative, spatially explicit metrics. Predictions were affected by substantial sampling biases, particularly from West to East. Significant discrepancies were found between non-spatial and spatially explicit metrics. The non-spatial metrics failed to detect predictions affected by sampling biases, often yielding higher scores for less reliable predictions. In contrast, spatially explicit metrics benefited the implementation of bias corrections. Moreover, the method to generate pseudo-absences was more influential in determining spatial differences between predictions than either the bias correction or the geographical characteristics of input occurrences. Overall, our findings reveal the utility of spatially explicit metrics as a complementary tool to evaluate SDMs affected by sampling biases.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004588Plant distributionPerformance metricsSampling biasBias correction |
| spellingShingle | Claudio A. Bracho-Estévanez Salvador Arenas-Castro Juan P. González-Varo Pablo González-Moreno Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases Ecological Informatics Plant distribution Performance metrics Sampling bias Bias correction |
| title | Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| title_full | Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| title_fullStr | Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| title_full_unstemmed | Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| title_short | Spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| title_sort | spatially explicit metrics improve the evaluation of species distribution models facing sampling biases |
| topic | Plant distribution Performance metrics Sampling bias Bias correction |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004588 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT claudioabrachoestevanez spatiallyexplicitmetricsimprovetheevaluationofspeciesdistributionmodelsfacingsamplingbiases AT salvadorarenascastro spatiallyexplicitmetricsimprovetheevaluationofspeciesdistributionmodelsfacingsamplingbiases AT juanpgonzalezvaro spatiallyexplicitmetricsimprovetheevaluationofspeciesdistributionmodelsfacingsamplingbiases AT pablogonzalezmoreno spatiallyexplicitmetricsimprovetheevaluationofspeciesdistributionmodelsfacingsamplingbiases |