Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam

ABSTRACT In 2008, we studied simulated toxicant efficacy to control invasive brown treesnakes (Boiga irregularis) using bait tubes (elongate bait stations that reduce non‐target bait take) in a 5‐ha enclosure in Guam (U.S. Territory) with a known population of snakes. Instead of toxicants, we implan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Björn Lardner, Amy A. Yackel Adams, Julie A. Savidge, Gordon H. Rodda, Robert N. Reed, Craig S. Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.297
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850257296078143488
author Björn Lardner
Amy A. Yackel Adams
Julie A. Savidge
Gordon H. Rodda
Robert N. Reed
Craig S. Clark
author_facet Björn Lardner
Amy A. Yackel Adams
Julie A. Savidge
Gordon H. Rodda
Robert N. Reed
Craig S. Clark
author_sort Björn Lardner
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT In 2008, we studied simulated toxicant efficacy to control invasive brown treesnakes (Boiga irregularis) using bait tubes (elongate bait stations that reduce non‐target bait take) in a 5‐ha enclosure in Guam (U.S. Territory) with a known population of snakes. Instead of toxicants, we implanted radiotransmitters in small (6.6 ± 1.4 g) and large (21.8 ± 2.9 g) bait‐mouse carcasses, offered from 2 types of bait tubes over a 3‐month period. The known snake population allowed us to characterize not only the snakes taking bait, but also those evading our mock control effort. Tube design had no effect on take rate, but snout–vent length was a strong predictor of bait take: none of the 30 snakes <843 mm in length took any bait, whereas 77 of the 126 snakes ≥843 mm in length took 164 baits. While medium‐sized snakes preferentially ingested small bait (and the largest snakes tended to take large mice more frequently), some of the smallest snakes that took bait ingested large mice. Snake body condition was positively correlated to take rate, but snake sex had no discernible effect. Our data show that there is a relatively narrow size (and, thus, time) gap between the size at which the snakes become susceptible to bait‐mouse take and the size at which they become sexually mature. This has implications for the timing of repeated baiting efforts, if the goal is eradication rather than suppression. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbe1dbc3f5774f10b5ddb29643bb66a2
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2013-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-dbe1dbc3f5774f10b5ddb29643bb66a22025-08-20T01:56:28ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402013-09-0137366467310.1002/wsb.297Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guamBjörn Lardner0Amy A. Yackel Adams1Julie A. Savidge2Gordon H. Rodda3Robert N. Reed4Craig S. Clark5Department of FishWildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsCO80523‐1474USAUnited States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center2150 Centre Avenue, Building CFort CollinsCO80526USADepartment of FishWildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsCO80523‐1474USAUnited States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center2150 Centre Avenue, Building CFort CollinsCO80526USAUnited States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center2150 Centre Avenue, Building CFort CollinsCO80526USAUnited States Department of AgricultureWildlife Services233 Pangelinan WayBarrigadaGU96913USAABSTRACT In 2008, we studied simulated toxicant efficacy to control invasive brown treesnakes (Boiga irregularis) using bait tubes (elongate bait stations that reduce non‐target bait take) in a 5‐ha enclosure in Guam (U.S. Territory) with a known population of snakes. Instead of toxicants, we implanted radiotransmitters in small (6.6 ± 1.4 g) and large (21.8 ± 2.9 g) bait‐mouse carcasses, offered from 2 types of bait tubes over a 3‐month period. The known snake population allowed us to characterize not only the snakes taking bait, but also those evading our mock control effort. Tube design had no effect on take rate, but snout–vent length was a strong predictor of bait take: none of the 30 snakes <843 mm in length took any bait, whereas 77 of the 126 snakes ≥843 mm in length took 164 baits. While medium‐sized snakes preferentially ingested small bait (and the largest snakes tended to take large mice more frequently), some of the smallest snakes that took bait ingested large mice. Snake body condition was positively correlated to take rate, but snake sex had no discernible effect. Our data show that there is a relatively narrow size (and, thus, time) gap between the size at which the snakes become susceptible to bait‐mouse take and the size at which they become sexually mature. This has implications for the timing of repeated baiting efforts, if the goal is eradication rather than suppression. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.297bait stationBoiga irregulariseradicationGuaminvasivesize selectivity
spellingShingle Björn Lardner
Amy A. Yackel Adams
Julie A. Savidge
Gordon H. Rodda
Robert N. Reed
Craig S. Clark
Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
Wildlife Society Bulletin
bait station
Boiga irregularis
eradication
Guam
invasive
size selectivity
title Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
title_full Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
title_fullStr Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
title_short Effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
title_sort effectiveness of bait tubes for brown treesnake control on guam
topic bait station
Boiga irregularis
eradication
Guam
invasive
size selectivity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.297
work_keys_str_mv AT bjornlardner effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam
AT amyayackeladams effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam
AT julieasavidge effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam
AT gordonhrodda effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam
AT robertnreed effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam
AT craigsclark effectivenessofbaittubesforbrowntreesnakecontrolonguam