Biopolitical Other

In the beginning of this short text, which will discuss the question of the postmodern Other, I will propose that the post-Other, or Other in the postmodern condition, be called the biopolitical Other. The thesis is as follows: when we think about the question of the Other in the contemporary condit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duško Petrović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zadar 2011-06-01
Series:[sic]
Online Access:http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=73
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849684529262886912
author Duško Petrović
author_facet Duško Petrović
author_sort Duško Petrović
collection DOAJ
description In the beginning of this short text, which will discuss the question of the postmodern Other, I will propose that the post-Other, or Other in the postmodern condition, be called the biopolitical Other. The thesis is as follows: when we think about the question of the Other in the contemporary condition, which for want of a better definition and following Lyotard could be named postmodern, the dominance of the biopolitical Other can be observed on a global scale. In approaching the question of the biopolitical Other, I will not follow the path usual in problematizing the biopolitical. When thinking about biopolitics, the usual path begins with the creator of the term, Foucault, to theorists who adopted and somewhat changed its original meaning, such as Agamben and others. I will approach the term of the biopolitical Other using terms borrowed from political theory which problematizes notions such as State, sovereignty, Nation-State, Law, international Law. I will begin the analysis starting with some aspects of the notion of sovereignty, problematized in the 1920s by Carl Schmitt and relate it to the notion of biopolitics, recently popularized by Agamben. But the path to the notion of biopolitics will be slightly different than Agamben's.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbd5042a3b134811a7309f365ea2cc6a
institution DOAJ
issn 1847-7755
language English
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher University of Zadar
record_format Article
series [sic]
spelling doaj-art-dbd5042a3b134811a7309f365ea2cc6a2025-08-20T03:23:26ZengUniversity of Zadar[sic]1847-77552011-06-011210.15291/sic/2.1.lc.873Biopolitical OtherDuško PetrovićIn the beginning of this short text, which will discuss the question of the postmodern Other, I will propose that the post-Other, or Other in the postmodern condition, be called the biopolitical Other. The thesis is as follows: when we think about the question of the Other in the contemporary condition, which for want of a better definition and following Lyotard could be named postmodern, the dominance of the biopolitical Other can be observed on a global scale. In approaching the question of the biopolitical Other, I will not follow the path usual in problematizing the biopolitical. When thinking about biopolitics, the usual path begins with the creator of the term, Foucault, to theorists who adopted and somewhat changed its original meaning, such as Agamben and others. I will approach the term of the biopolitical Other using terms borrowed from political theory which problematizes notions such as State, sovereignty, Nation-State, Law, international Law. I will begin the analysis starting with some aspects of the notion of sovereignty, problematized in the 1920s by Carl Schmitt and relate it to the notion of biopolitics, recently popularized by Agamben. But the path to the notion of biopolitics will be slightly different than Agamben's.http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=73
spellingShingle Duško Petrović
Biopolitical Other
[sic]
title Biopolitical Other
title_full Biopolitical Other
title_fullStr Biopolitical Other
title_full_unstemmed Biopolitical Other
title_short Biopolitical Other
title_sort biopolitical other
url http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=73
work_keys_str_mv AT duskopetrovic biopoliticalother