Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management

This study assesses effective training methods that support in-person, post-graduate, exam invigilators to build awareness of institutional policies as well as heighten their comfort and confidence with invigilating in the exam setting. Vigilant, active invigilators are considered effective in reduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tammy L. Cameron, Adriana C. Salvia, Nazlin Z. Hirji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Humber Press 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/article/view/81
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850101691920154624
author Tammy L. Cameron
Adriana C. Salvia
Nazlin Z. Hirji
author_facet Tammy L. Cameron
Adriana C. Salvia
Nazlin Z. Hirji
author_sort Tammy L. Cameron
collection DOAJ
description This study assesses effective training methods that support in-person, post-graduate, exam invigilators to build awareness of institutional policies as well as heighten their comfort and confidence with invigilating in the exam setting. Vigilant, active invigilators are considered effective in reducing student cheating behaviour on exams (Alabi, 2014; Attoh Odongo et al., 2021; Feng & Ouyang, 2021; Siniver, 2013). This study followed 26 exam invigilators of varying experience through pre-training, training, and post-exam invigilation. Invigilators completed an online survey prior to participating in an in-person, half-day training session, self-identifying existing levels of experience, policy knowledge, and comfort/confidence in the exam setting in numerous situations. Upon completion of an in-person training session in a group setting, they completed a second online survey, which showed overall improvement. Invigilators were then assigned a live, in-person invigilation shift and following this, completed a third online survey. The study concludes that the training methods implemented foster confident and capable exam invigilators who support students’ compliance with academic integrity. With the shift to online testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, consideration needs to be given as to whether in-person invigilators retain the knowledge when they experience lengthy lapses of employment, and how their learned skills may be transferable to the online environment. 
format Article
id doaj-art-db92e8cbfedf46d2a85a8eb2867577d5
institution DOAJ
issn 2561-5904
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Humber Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education
spelling doaj-art-db92e8cbfedf46d2a85a8eb2867577d52025-08-20T02:39:56ZengHumber PressJournal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education2561-59042023-01-014210.69520/jipe.v4i2.81Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam ManagementTammy L. Cameron0Adriana C. Salvia1Nazlin Z. Hirji2Humber College ITALHumber College ITALInsurance Institute of CanadaThis study assesses effective training methods that support in-person, post-graduate, exam invigilators to build awareness of institutional policies as well as heighten their comfort and confidence with invigilating in the exam setting. Vigilant, active invigilators are considered effective in reducing student cheating behaviour on exams (Alabi, 2014; Attoh Odongo et al., 2021; Feng & Ouyang, 2021; Siniver, 2013). This study followed 26 exam invigilators of varying experience through pre-training, training, and post-exam invigilation. Invigilators completed an online survey prior to participating in an in-person, half-day training session, self-identifying existing levels of experience, policy knowledge, and comfort/confidence in the exam setting in numerous situations. Upon completion of an in-person training session in a group setting, they completed a second online survey, which showed overall improvement. Invigilators were then assigned a live, in-person invigilation shift and following this, completed a third online survey. The study concludes that the training methods implemented foster confident and capable exam invigilators who support students’ compliance with academic integrity. With the shift to online testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, consideration needs to be given as to whether in-person invigilators retain the knowledge when they experience lengthy lapses of employment, and how their learned skills may be transferable to the online environment.  https://jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/article/view/81proctorshonour codesacademic integrityexam managementface-to-facepost-graduate
spellingShingle Tammy L. Cameron
Adriana C. Salvia
Nazlin Z. Hirji
Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education
proctors
honour codes
academic integrity
exam management
face-to-face
post-graduate
title Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
title_full Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
title_fullStr Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
title_full_unstemmed Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
title_short Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
title_sort building training methodology preparing invigilators for active in person exam management
topic proctors
honour codes
academic integrity
exam management
face-to-face
post-graduate
url https://jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/article/view/81
work_keys_str_mv AT tammylcameron buildingtrainingmethodologypreparinginvigilatorsforactiveinpersonexammanagement
AT adrianacsalvia buildingtrainingmethodologypreparinginvigilatorsforactiveinpersonexammanagement
AT nazlinzhirji buildingtrainingmethodologypreparinginvigilatorsforactiveinpersonexammanagement