Towards a political concept of dignity

This paper proposes a new way of thinking about the concept of dignity. It argues that existing conceptions of dignity in moral and legal philosophy fail to meet three key tests: conceptual soundness, analytical usefulness, and a capacity to vindicate the principle of moral egalitarianism. It sugges...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Samuel Harrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Political Research Exchange
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2361163
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846110283210162176
author Samuel Harrison
author_facet Samuel Harrison
author_sort Samuel Harrison
collection DOAJ
description This paper proposes a new way of thinking about the concept of dignity. It argues that existing conceptions of dignity in moral and legal philosophy fail to meet three key tests: conceptual soundness, analytical usefulness, and a capacity to vindicate the principle of moral egalitarianism. It suggests that we can better satisfy all three of these conditions if we treat dignity as a relational and political concept that is defined by a sense of what we are due. This means its content derives not from any transcendental truth or legal authority but has to be negotiated between different actors. It can then be asserted as part of an egalitarian project without needing to make reference to an external authority or a confused conceptual base. It seeks to show that this understanding of dignity is free of the conceptual confusion that plagues the existing conceptions; is closer to the ‘common’ understanding of dignity in ordinary language and thus more analytically useful; finally can be deployed more successfully in defence of the principle of moral equality.
format Article
id doaj-art-db8c422517dc437886e649a2aad381e2
institution Kabale University
issn 2474-736X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Political Research Exchange
spelling doaj-art-db8c422517dc437886e649a2aad381e22024-12-24T11:33:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPolitical Research Exchange2474-736X2024-12-016110.1080/2474736X.2024.2361163Towards a political concept of dignitySamuel Harrison0Faculty of History, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKThis paper proposes a new way of thinking about the concept of dignity. It argues that existing conceptions of dignity in moral and legal philosophy fail to meet three key tests: conceptual soundness, analytical usefulness, and a capacity to vindicate the principle of moral egalitarianism. It suggests that we can better satisfy all three of these conditions if we treat dignity as a relational and political concept that is defined by a sense of what we are due. This means its content derives not from any transcendental truth or legal authority but has to be negotiated between different actors. It can then be asserted as part of an egalitarian project without needing to make reference to an external authority or a confused conceptual base. It seeks to show that this understanding of dignity is free of the conceptual confusion that plagues the existing conceptions; is closer to the ‘common’ understanding of dignity in ordinary language and thus more analytically useful; finally can be deployed more successfully in defence of the principle of moral equality.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2361163Dignitymoral philosophylegal philosophyegalitarianismuniversalism
spellingShingle Samuel Harrison
Towards a political concept of dignity
Political Research Exchange
Dignity
moral philosophy
legal philosophy
egalitarianism
universalism
title Towards a political concept of dignity
title_full Towards a political concept of dignity
title_fullStr Towards a political concept of dignity
title_full_unstemmed Towards a political concept of dignity
title_short Towards a political concept of dignity
title_sort towards a political concept of dignity
topic Dignity
moral philosophy
legal philosophy
egalitarianism
universalism
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2361163
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelharrison towardsapoliticalconceptofdignity