Me vs. the machine? Subjective evaluations of human- and AI-generated advice
Abstract Artificial intelligence (“AI”) has the potential to vastly improve human decision-making. In line with this, researchers have increasingly sought to understand how people view AI, often documenting skepticism and even outright aversion to these tools. In the present research, we complement...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Merrick R. Osborne, Erica R. Bailey |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86623-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Artificial intelligence vs. human expert: Licensed mental health clinicians' blinded evaluation of AI-generated and expert psychological advice on quality, empathy, and perceived authorship
by: Ludwig Franke Föyen, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01) -
Advice-Taking for Objective Face Age Estimates Relative to Subjective Face Trustworthiness Estimates
by: Joseph R. Phillips, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
The Concentrated City: Effects of AI-Generated Travel Advice on the Spatial Distribution of Tourists
by: Daniel Paül i Agustí
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Can ChatGPT Plan Your Retirement?: Generative AI and Financial Advice
by: Andrew W. Lo, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
AI in relationship counselling: Evaluating ChatGPT's therapeutic capabilities in providing relationship advice
by: Laura M. Vowels, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)