Testing the validity of the broaden-and build theory of positive emotions: a network analytic approach

IntroductionThe Broaden-and-Build Theory of positive emotions is one of the best known and applied theories in Positive Psychology. It argues that positive emotions initiate an upward movement by opening up the mind and broadening thoughts and thus represents a counter model to the vicious circle-mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leopold Helmut Otto Roth, Celine Bencker, Johanna Lorenz, Anton-Rupert Laireiter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405272/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionThe Broaden-and-Build Theory of positive emotions is one of the best known and applied theories in Positive Psychology. It argues that positive emotions initiate an upward movement by opening up the mind and broadening thoughts and thus represents a counter model to the vicious circle-models of clinical psychology. The number of studies directly testing this theory in all components is scarce, ambiguities in the model impede clear inference.MethodTo draw a conclusive picture on within-model processes, we applied network modeling on the components of the theory across two studies (N1 = 312; N2 = 302).ResultsIn both studies, the positive relationship between positive emotions, resources and life outcomes is well-supported, yet the role of broadening, as an intermediary component within these is questioned.DiscussionAs the broadening component consistently deviated from the model’s predictions and thus did not contribute to the model as expected in either study, the validity of the Broaden-and-Build Theory in its current conceptualization is challenged, and our results point to the need to reassess the role of broadening.
ISSN:1664-1078