Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey
Background: Collaborative methods are necessary to meet patient palliative care (PC) needs because of the inadequate supply of PC specialists. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a needs assessment and determine primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians’ general attitudes about primary PCs...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mary Ann Liebert
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Palliative Medicine Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2024.0110 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850172086686842880 |
|---|---|
| author | Rachel D. Havyer Rachel M. Wiste Cory Ingram Jennifer L. Ridgeway Kathleen J. Yost |
| author_facet | Rachel D. Havyer Rachel M. Wiste Cory Ingram Jennifer L. Ridgeway Kathleen J. Yost |
| author_sort | Rachel D. Havyer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Collaborative methods are necessary to meet patient palliative care (PC) needs because of the inadequate supply of PC specialists.
Objective: This study aimed to conduct a needs assessment and determine primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians’ general attitudes about primary PCs, confidence in managing common PC scenarios, and preferences for interaction with specialty PCs.
Design: A sequential mixed-methods study design was used, whereby individual qualitative interviews informed the content of a quantitative survey. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted by a member of the study team with expertise in qualitative research methods.
Setting/Subjects: The quantitative survey, delivered to primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians across four distinct geographic locations of a large health system, solicited impressions on common clinical PC scenarios that might pose challenges.
Measurements: Survey data included demographic information, clinician confidence levels, preferences for support in managing PC scenarios, and likelihood to refer to PC.
Results: The quantitative survey was completed by 126 physicians (response rate, 13.9%). Overall mean (standard deviation) confidence levels were lowest for a scenario about handling pain (5.57 [2.35] out of 10) and highest for goals-of-care conversations with the patient (7.80 [2.02]). Spearman correlations between mean confidence and likelihood to refer to PC demonstrated weak to moderate inverse correlations. Respondents with previous training in PC had higher mean confidence in managing symptoms and goals-of-care conversations.
Conclusions: Continuing efforts are needed to help improve physicians’ confidence in primary PC skills and develop innovative methods to provide collaborative support of specialty PCs across various specialties and PC needs. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-da4526d0c0474c0a8c577a4642e4daf7 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2689-2820 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Mary Ann Liebert |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Palliative Medicine Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-da4526d0c0474c0a8c577a4642e4daf72025-08-20T02:20:09ZengMary Ann LiebertPalliative Medicine Reports2689-28202025-04-016121522210.1089/PMR.2024.0110Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods SurveyRachel D. HavyerRachel M. WisteCory IngramJennifer L. RidgewayKathleen J. YostBackground: Collaborative methods are necessary to meet patient palliative care (PC) needs because of the inadequate supply of PC specialists. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a needs assessment and determine primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians’ general attitudes about primary PCs, confidence in managing common PC scenarios, and preferences for interaction with specialty PCs. Design: A sequential mixed-methods study design was used, whereby individual qualitative interviews informed the content of a quantitative survey. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted by a member of the study team with expertise in qualitative research methods. Setting/Subjects: The quantitative survey, delivered to primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians across four distinct geographic locations of a large health system, solicited impressions on common clinical PC scenarios that might pose challenges. Measurements: Survey data included demographic information, clinician confidence levels, preferences for support in managing PC scenarios, and likelihood to refer to PC. Results: The quantitative survey was completed by 126 physicians (response rate, 13.9%). Overall mean (standard deviation) confidence levels were lowest for a scenario about handling pain (5.57 [2.35] out of 10) and highest for goals-of-care conversations with the patient (7.80 [2.02]). Spearman correlations between mean confidence and likelihood to refer to PC demonstrated weak to moderate inverse correlations. Respondents with previous training in PC had higher mean confidence in managing symptoms and goals-of-care conversations. Conclusions: Continuing efforts are needed to help improve physicians’ confidence in primary PC skills and develop innovative methods to provide collaborative support of specialty PCs across various specialties and PC needs.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2024.0110generalist palliative carespecialty palliative careutilization |
| spellingShingle | Rachel D. Havyer Rachel M. Wiste Cory Ingram Jennifer L. Ridgeway Kathleen J. Yost Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey Palliative Medicine Reports generalist palliative care specialty palliative care utilization |
| title | Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey |
| title_full | Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey |
| title_fullStr | Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey |
| title_short | Physicians’ Confidence in Primary Palliative Care and Preferred Methods of Responding: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Survey |
| title_sort | physicians confidence in primary palliative care and preferred methods of responding a sequential mixed methods survey |
| topic | generalist palliative care specialty palliative care utilization |
| url | https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2024.0110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT racheldhavyer physiciansconfidenceinprimarypalliativecareandpreferredmethodsofrespondingasequentialmixedmethodssurvey AT rachelmwiste physiciansconfidenceinprimarypalliativecareandpreferredmethodsofrespondingasequentialmixedmethodssurvey AT coryingram physiciansconfidenceinprimarypalliativecareandpreferredmethodsofrespondingasequentialmixedmethodssurvey AT jenniferlridgeway physiciansconfidenceinprimarypalliativecareandpreferredmethodsofrespondingasequentialmixedmethodssurvey AT kathleenjyost physiciansconfidenceinprimarypalliativecareandpreferredmethodsofrespondingasequentialmixedmethodssurvey |