Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential tools in evaluating chronic ankle instability (CAI), capturing subjective experiences such as “giving way” and instability. However, no standardized guidelines exist for selecting PROMs in CAI, resulting in limited comparability across studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lijiang Luan, Jeremy Witchalls, Phil Newman, Adrian Pranata, Charlotte Ganderton, Oren Tirosh, Doa El-Ansary, Roger David Adams, Gordon Waddington, Jia Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1602283/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849336597361721344
author Lijiang Luan
Lijiang Luan
Jeremy Witchalls
Phil Newman
Adrian Pranata
Charlotte Ganderton
Charlotte Ganderton
Oren Tirosh
Doa El-Ansary
Doa El-Ansary
Roger David Adams
Roger David Adams
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
author_facet Lijiang Luan
Lijiang Luan
Jeremy Witchalls
Phil Newman
Adrian Pranata
Charlotte Ganderton
Charlotte Ganderton
Oren Tirosh
Doa El-Ansary
Doa El-Ansary
Roger David Adams
Roger David Adams
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
author_sort Lijiang Luan
collection DOAJ
description Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential tools in evaluating chronic ankle instability (CAI), capturing subjective experiences such as “giving way” and instability. However, no standardized guidelines exist for selecting PROMs in CAI, resulting in limited comparability across studies and clinical settings. This paper highlights four key considerations for selecting PROMs in assessing CAI: recalibration in populations including individuals with CAI, identifiability of ankle instability, detectability of CAI characteristics, and cross-cultural adaptability. It emphasizes that CAI-specific PROMs should demonstrate high pertinence, accurately distinguishing CAI from other conditions, and effectively detecting symptom changes over time. Furthermore, widely adopted PROMs may offer greater credibility and applicability. Addressing these considerations is crucial for improving CAI diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and advancing patient-centered care.
format Article
id doaj-art-da3b8bc330ed4e9698186036aec3245c
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-4185
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-da3b8bc330ed4e9698186036aec3245c2025-08-20T03:44:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852025-06-011310.3389/fbioe.2025.16022831602283Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instabilityLijiang Luan0Lijiang Luan1Jeremy Witchalls2Phil Newman3Adrian Pranata4Charlotte Ganderton5Charlotte Ganderton6Oren Tirosh7Doa El-Ansary8Doa El-Ansary9Roger David Adams10Roger David Adams11Gordon Waddington12Gordon Waddington13Jia Han14Jia Han15Jia Han16Jia Han17Jia Han18Jiangwan Hospital of Hongkou District, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Surgery, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaJiangwan Hospital of Hongkou District, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaCollege of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, ChinaPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential tools in evaluating chronic ankle instability (CAI), capturing subjective experiences such as “giving way” and instability. However, no standardized guidelines exist for selecting PROMs in CAI, resulting in limited comparability across studies and clinical settings. This paper highlights four key considerations for selecting PROMs in assessing CAI: recalibration in populations including individuals with CAI, identifiability of ankle instability, detectability of CAI characteristics, and cross-cultural adaptability. It emphasizes that CAI-specific PROMs should demonstrate high pertinence, accurately distinguishing CAI from other conditions, and effectively detecting symptom changes over time. Furthermore, widely adopted PROMs may offer greater credibility and applicability. Addressing these considerations is crucial for improving CAI diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and advancing patient-centered care.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1602283/fullchronic ankle instabilitypatient-reported outcome measuresreliabilityvalidityresponsiveness
spellingShingle Lijiang Luan
Lijiang Luan
Jeremy Witchalls
Phil Newman
Adrian Pranata
Charlotte Ganderton
Charlotte Ganderton
Oren Tirosh
Doa El-Ansary
Doa El-Ansary
Roger David Adams
Roger David Adams
Gordon Waddington
Gordon Waddington
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Jia Han
Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
chronic ankle instability
patient-reported outcome measures
reliability
validity
responsiveness
title Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
title_full Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
title_fullStr Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
title_full_unstemmed Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
title_short Considerations in the selection of patient-reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
title_sort considerations in the selection of patient reported outcome measures for assessing function related to chronic ankle instability
topic chronic ankle instability
patient-reported outcome measures
reliability
validity
responsiveness
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1602283/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lijiangluan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT lijiangluan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jeremywitchalls considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT philnewman considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT adrianpranata considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT charlotteganderton considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT charlotteganderton considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT orentirosh considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT doaelansary considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT doaelansary considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT rogerdavidadams considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT rogerdavidadams considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT gordonwaddington considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT gordonwaddington considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jiahan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jiahan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jiahan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jiahan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability
AT jiahan considerationsintheselectionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforassessingfunctionrelatedtochronicankleinstability