Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)

The results of the study on the subjective structure of diology “Journey to Malorossia” by P. I. Shalikov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the multilevel model of the subject of consciousness and the subject of speech in conjunction with spatial and temporal components...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O. V. Kublitskaya
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2022-10-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4033
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849223523263840256
author O. V. Kublitskaya
author_facet O. V. Kublitskaya
author_sort O. V. Kublitskaya
collection DOAJ
description The results of the study on the subjective structure of diology “Journey to Malorossia” by P. I. Shalikov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the multilevel model of the subject of consciousness and the subject of speech in conjunction with spatial and temporal components of the text. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that for the first time the specificity of the subject is characterized in the prose of “mass sentimentalism” as “I” of an individual, “I” of a citizen and “I” of a litterateur — a “sentimental traveller”. The relevance of the study is due to the permanent interest in understanding the category of the author in a broad theoretical context, inter alia, by means of system-subjective approach. It is argued that in “Journey to Malorossia” the subject of consciousness and the subject of speech are actualized primarily as an individual, despite the author’s desire to follow the tradition of the sentimental prose. It is shown that the spatio-temporal organization of the text is simplified, landscape descriptions are schematic and the absence of temporal markers indicates a contradiction between the intention of being “in the flow of feeling” versus everyday narrative. The article concludes that the attempt of P. I. Shalikov to embed an individual artistic system into the paradigm of sentimentalism (from the individual author to the system author) is unsuccessful.
format Article
id doaj-art-da396d34c6b84452869b09ba8d3ebb72
institution Kabale University
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj-art-da396d34c6b84452869b09ba8d3ebb722025-08-25T18:13:28ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952022-10-0111728430310.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-7-284-3032280Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)O. V. Kublitskaya0Pushkin Leningrad State UniversityThe results of the study on the subjective structure of diology “Journey to Malorossia” by P. I. Shalikov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the multilevel model of the subject of consciousness and the subject of speech in conjunction with spatial and temporal components of the text. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that for the first time the specificity of the subject is characterized in the prose of “mass sentimentalism” as “I” of an individual, “I” of a citizen and “I” of a litterateur — a “sentimental traveller”. The relevance of the study is due to the permanent interest in understanding the category of the author in a broad theoretical context, inter alia, by means of system-subjective approach. It is argued that in “Journey to Malorossia” the subject of consciousness and the subject of speech are actualized primarily as an individual, despite the author’s desire to follow the tradition of the sentimental prose. It is shown that the spatio-temporal organization of the text is simplified, landscape descriptions are schematic and the absence of temporal markers indicates a contradiction between the intention of being “in the flow of feeling” versus everyday narrative. The article concludes that the attempt of P. I. Shalikov to embed an individual artistic system into the paradigm of sentimentalism (from the individual author to the system author) is unsuccessful.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4033travel literaturetraveloguemass sentimentalismsystem-subjective approachp. i. shalikov
spellingShingle O. V. Kublitskaya
Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
Научный диалог
travel literature
travelogue
mass sentimentalism
system-subjective approach
p. i. shalikov
title Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
title_full Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
title_fullStr Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
title_short Subjective Structure of “Mass Sentimentalism” Travels (P. I. Shalikov “Journey to Malorossia”)
title_sort subjective structure of mass sentimentalism travels p i shalikov journey to malorossia
topic travel literature
travelogue
mass sentimentalism
system-subjective approach
p. i. shalikov
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4033
work_keys_str_mv AT ovkublitskaya subjectivestructureofmasssentimentalismtravelspishalikovjourneytomalorossia