Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence

Introduction:: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem in women. When conservative therapy fails, surgical interventions should be considered. Midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced in the 1990s and have been the golden standard for surgical treatment of SUI. Despite being the golde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva M.P. Remmen, John P.F.A. Heesakkers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Continence Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974525000043
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849689961992814592
author Eva M.P. Remmen
John P.F.A. Heesakkers
author_facet Eva M.P. Remmen
John P.F.A. Heesakkers
author_sort Eva M.P. Remmen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem in women. When conservative therapy fails, surgical interventions should be considered. Midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced in the 1990s and have been the golden standard for surgical treatment of SUI. Despite being the golden standard among several different surgical options for SUI, failure rates vary from 8% to 57%. There is no defined standard of care after failed MUS. Sling plication is a less invasive procedure compared to other surgical options, however data is relatively scarce. Methods:: Three women who underwent sling plication for persistent SUI after retropubic MUS were identified. Sling plication was performed by the same physician. The polypropylene sling was isolated and cut medially. Sling ends were then folded over each other and fixated with prolene sutures. Tensioning of the sling was based on the subjective assessment of the surgeon. Subjective and objective findings were collected before initial placement of MUS, after placement of MUS and at six and twelve weeks after plication of MUS. Results:: All three women had a satisfactory reduction of SUI symptoms after sling plication. Reduction in pad use was clinically relevant, decreasing from two to six large pads to a maximum of two small pads a day. There were no post-operative complications. All women would recommend sling plication to others in the same situation. Conclusion:: Sling plication is an effective, safe and less invasive way of treating persistent or recurrent SUI after midurethral sling surgery and should be considered when counselling patients after failed MUS. Further research with bigger study populations, standardised methods to quantify improvement after plication and longer follow-up is needed to verify our positive results.
format Article
id doaj-art-da293cc0792c4df7bd654e77157febc5
institution DOAJ
issn 2772-9745
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Continence Reports
spelling doaj-art-da293cc0792c4df7bd654e77157febc52025-08-20T03:21:27ZengElsevierContinence Reports2772-97452025-06-011410008110.1016/j.contre.2025.100081Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinenceEva M.P. Remmen0John P.F.A. Heesakkers1Corresponding author.; Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsMaastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsIntroduction:: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem in women. When conservative therapy fails, surgical interventions should be considered. Midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced in the 1990s and have been the golden standard for surgical treatment of SUI. Despite being the golden standard among several different surgical options for SUI, failure rates vary from 8% to 57%. There is no defined standard of care after failed MUS. Sling plication is a less invasive procedure compared to other surgical options, however data is relatively scarce. Methods:: Three women who underwent sling plication for persistent SUI after retropubic MUS were identified. Sling plication was performed by the same physician. The polypropylene sling was isolated and cut medially. Sling ends were then folded over each other and fixated with prolene sutures. Tensioning of the sling was based on the subjective assessment of the surgeon. Subjective and objective findings were collected before initial placement of MUS, after placement of MUS and at six and twelve weeks after plication of MUS. Results:: All three women had a satisfactory reduction of SUI symptoms after sling plication. Reduction in pad use was clinically relevant, decreasing from two to six large pads to a maximum of two small pads a day. There were no post-operative complications. All women would recommend sling plication to others in the same situation. Conclusion:: Sling plication is an effective, safe and less invasive way of treating persistent or recurrent SUI after midurethral sling surgery and should be considered when counselling patients after failed MUS. Further research with bigger study populations, standardised methods to quantify improvement after plication and longer follow-up is needed to verify our positive results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974525000043Female stress urinary incontinencePersistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral slingMidurethral slingMidurethral sling plicationRetropubic sling plication
spellingShingle Eva M.P. Remmen
John P.F.A. Heesakkers
Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
Continence Reports
Female stress urinary incontinence
Persistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling
Midurethral sling
Midurethral sling plication
Retropubic sling plication
title Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
title_full Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
title_fullStr Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
title_short Sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
title_sort sling plication for failed midurethral sling surgery to treat female stress urinary incontinence
topic Female stress urinary incontinence
Persistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling
Midurethral sling
Midurethral sling plication
Retropubic sling plication
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974525000043
work_keys_str_mv AT evampremmen slingplicationforfailedmidurethralslingsurgerytotreatfemalestressurinaryincontinence
AT johnpfaheesakkers slingplicationforfailedmidurethralslingsurgerytotreatfemalestressurinaryincontinence