Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning

[Objective:] To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement guided by dynamic navigation by comparing digital intraoral scanning (IOS) with the traditional cone beam CT (CBCT)-based method, and to provide further evidence for the feasibility of using IOS as an evaluation tool. [Methods:] Sixty mandib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU Yitian, XU Zonghe, XIAO Yanjun, XU Qiyin, GUO Wen, ZHANG Sihui, WU Dong
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2025-06-01
Series:Kouqiang hemian waike zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2025.03.006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225061730353152
author LIU Yitian
XU Zonghe
XIAO Yanjun
XU Qiyin
GUO Wen
ZHANG Sihui
WU Dong
author_facet LIU Yitian
XU Zonghe
XIAO Yanjun
XU Qiyin
GUO Wen
ZHANG Sihui
WU Dong
author_sort LIU Yitian
collection DOAJ
description [Objective:] To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement guided by dynamic navigation by comparing digital intraoral scanning (IOS) with the traditional cone beam CT (CBCT)-based method, and to provide further evidence for the feasibility of using IOS as an evaluation tool. [Methods:] Sixty mandibular resin models were printed, and 2 implants (31 and 36) were placed in each model using dynamic computer-aided implant surgery. One hundred and twenty implants were placed. Postoperatively, the achieved implant positions were assessed using both CBCT and IOS. The implant deviations were then measured by importing the data into an accuracy analysis software. [Results:] Significant differences between CBCT and IOS were observed in global coronal and angular deviations (P<0.01), but not for the other deviations. The differences between the two methods were statistically significant for the global coronal, lateral coronal, and angular deviations (P<0.01) at site 31, and for the vertical coronal, vertical apical, and angular deviations (P<0.05) at site 36. [Conclusion:] The accuracy of the IOS-based evaluation method for measuring implant accuracy is consistent with that of the conventional CBCT assessment method and meets the clinical requirements. However, further clinical study is required to confirm the accuracy and feasibility of this method.
format Article
id doaj-art-da261b2c46314d979e9e4e568fd28989
institution Kabale University
issn 1005-4979
language zho
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Editorial Office of Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
record_format Article
series Kouqiang hemian waike zazhi
spelling doaj-art-da261b2c46314d979e9e4e568fd289892025-08-25T06:12:15ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryKouqiang hemian waike zazhi1005-49792025-06-0135320521310.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2025.03.006Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanningLIU Yitian0XU Zonghe1XIAO Yanjun2XU Qiyin3GUO Wen4ZHANG Sihui5WU Dong6Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001[Objective:] To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement guided by dynamic navigation by comparing digital intraoral scanning (IOS) with the traditional cone beam CT (CBCT)-based method, and to provide further evidence for the feasibility of using IOS as an evaluation tool. [Methods:] Sixty mandibular resin models were printed, and 2 implants (31 and 36) were placed in each model using dynamic computer-aided implant surgery. One hundred and twenty implants were placed. Postoperatively, the achieved implant positions were assessed using both CBCT and IOS. The implant deviations were then measured by importing the data into an accuracy analysis software. [Results:] Significant differences between CBCT and IOS were observed in global coronal and angular deviations (P<0.01), but not for the other deviations. The differences between the two methods were statistically significant for the global coronal, lateral coronal, and angular deviations (P<0.01) at site 31, and for the vertical coronal, vertical apical, and angular deviations (P<0.05) at site 36. [Conclusion:] The accuracy of the IOS-based evaluation method for measuring implant accuracy is consistent with that of the conventional CBCT assessment method and meets the clinical requirements. However, further clinical study is required to confirm the accuracy and feasibility of this method.https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2025.03.006intraoral scandynamic navigationimplant accuracycone beam ct
spellingShingle LIU Yitian
XU Zonghe
XIAO Yanjun
XU Qiyin
GUO Wen
ZHANG Sihui
WU Dong
Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
Kouqiang hemian waike zazhi
intraoral scan
dynamic navigation
implant accuracy
cone beam ct
title Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
title_full Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
title_fullStr Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
title_short Evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
title_sort evaluation of the implant placement accuracy under dynamic navigation guidance using intraoral scanning
topic intraoral scan
dynamic navigation
implant accuracy
cone beam ct
url https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2025.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyitian evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT xuzonghe evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT xiaoyanjun evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT xuqiyin evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT guowen evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT zhangsihui evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning
AT wudong evaluationoftheimplantplacementaccuracyunderdynamicnavigationguidanceusingintraoralscanning