Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study
BackgroundManaging risk effectively within small animal veterinary practice is integral for staff, patient and client safety. Veterinary personnel are exposed to many risks, including bites, scratches, sharps injuries and exposure to zoonotic diseases and multi-resistant organisms. Patients may also...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388107/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850194392287019008 |
|---|---|
| author | Angela Willemsen Rowland Cobbold Justine Gibson Kathryn Wilks Kathryn Wilks Simon Reid |
| author_facet | Angela Willemsen Rowland Cobbold Justine Gibson Kathryn Wilks Kathryn Wilks Simon Reid |
| author_sort | Angela Willemsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundManaging risk effectively within small animal veterinary practice is integral for staff, patient and client safety. Veterinary personnel are exposed to many risks, including bites, scratches, sharps injuries and exposure to zoonotic diseases and multi-resistant organisms. Patients may also be exposed to healthcare-associated infections, including multi-resistant organisms. While veterinary owners/managers have a duty of care under legislated Workplace Health and Safety requirements, all staff have a responsibility to contribute to assessing and minimizing risk. The application of standard and transmission precautions will help with risk minimization. This study aimed to determine how small animal veterinary staff understand and perceive infection prevention and control risk and to provide recommendations to assist with risk mitigation.MethodsA mixed methods design was used. A digital questionnaire was administered to small animal veterinary staff in Australia to identify knowledge, attitudes and practices of risk related behaviors. Follow up focus groups were conducted with small animal practitioners to explore factors supporting and preventing veterinary staff from implementing recommended practices identified in the questionnaire.ResultsSmall animal veterinary staff acknowledged they participated in many high-risk activities, including recapping needles and eating and drinking in patient care areas. Injuries were common, with 77% of staff receiving a bite or scratch, and 22% receiving a sharps injury in the preceding six months. Less than one in five of these incidents was reported. Staff agreed effective infection prevention and control was the responsibility of all staff, but a designated staff member should take responsibility for managing it. The practice owner/manager was integral to supporting and promoting recommended strategies, contributing to a positive workplace culture and improving safety for staff and patients.ConclusionSmall animal veterinary staff have some understanding of how to identify, report, manage and mitigate risk but were limited by their knowledge of infection prevention and control principles. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-da132984a17c4f039e2cdba91d8f7f14 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2296-2565 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-da132984a17c4f039e2cdba91d8f7f142025-08-20T02:14:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652024-11-011210.3389/fpubh.2024.13881071388107Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods studyAngela Willemsen0Rowland Cobbold1Justine Gibson2Kathryn Wilks3Kathryn Wilks4Simon Reid5School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaInfectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaBackgroundManaging risk effectively within small animal veterinary practice is integral for staff, patient and client safety. Veterinary personnel are exposed to many risks, including bites, scratches, sharps injuries and exposure to zoonotic diseases and multi-resistant organisms. Patients may also be exposed to healthcare-associated infections, including multi-resistant organisms. While veterinary owners/managers have a duty of care under legislated Workplace Health and Safety requirements, all staff have a responsibility to contribute to assessing and minimizing risk. The application of standard and transmission precautions will help with risk minimization. This study aimed to determine how small animal veterinary staff understand and perceive infection prevention and control risk and to provide recommendations to assist with risk mitigation.MethodsA mixed methods design was used. A digital questionnaire was administered to small animal veterinary staff in Australia to identify knowledge, attitudes and practices of risk related behaviors. Follow up focus groups were conducted with small animal practitioners to explore factors supporting and preventing veterinary staff from implementing recommended practices identified in the questionnaire.ResultsSmall animal veterinary staff acknowledged they participated in many high-risk activities, including recapping needles and eating and drinking in patient care areas. Injuries were common, with 77% of staff receiving a bite or scratch, and 22% receiving a sharps injury in the preceding six months. Less than one in five of these incidents was reported. Staff agreed effective infection prevention and control was the responsibility of all staff, but a designated staff member should take responsibility for managing it. The practice owner/manager was integral to supporting and promoting recommended strategies, contributing to a positive workplace culture and improving safety for staff and patients.ConclusionSmall animal veterinary staff have some understanding of how to identify, report, manage and mitigate risk but were limited by their knowledge of infection prevention and control principles.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388107/fullsmall animalrisk managementinfection prevention and controlstandard precautionstransmission precautionszoonoses |
| spellingShingle | Angela Willemsen Rowland Cobbold Justine Gibson Kathryn Wilks Kathryn Wilks Simon Reid Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study Frontiers in Public Health small animal risk management infection prevention and control standard precautions transmission precautions zoonoses |
| title | Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study |
| title_full | Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study |
| title_fullStr | Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study |
| title_short | Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study |
| title_sort | are we doing enough to control infection risk in australian small animal veterinary practice findings from a mixed methods study |
| topic | small animal risk management infection prevention and control standard precautions transmission precautions zoonoses |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388107/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT angelawillemsen arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT rowlandcobbold arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT justinegibson arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT kathrynwilks arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT kathrynwilks arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT simonreid arewedoingenoughtocontrolinfectionriskinaustraliansmallanimalveterinarypracticefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudy |