Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University
Bursa Technical University (BTU) is committed to achieving sustainability goals and has taken significant steps in this direction. This study was conducted in accordance with the emission factors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the conversion factors of the Department of Environment...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bursa Technical University
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jise.btu.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/4139383 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849701274954498048 |
|---|---|
| author | Somaia Shahin Samet ÖZTÜRK |
| author_facet | Somaia Shahin Samet ÖZTÜRK |
| author_sort | Somaia Shahin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Bursa Technical University (BTU) is committed to achieving sustainability goals and has taken significant steps in this direction. This study was conducted in accordance with the emission factors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the conversion factors of the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The study was carried out in line with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14064 and ISO 14001 standards and in harmony with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), drawing on the experiences of five Turkish universities. This paper provides detailed information on BTU's carbon footprint calculation methodology, the standards used, and its alignment with the SDGs. The application of two distinct emission factors, those of EPA and DEFRA, yielded divergent carbon footprint (CF) values for BTU. The EPA approach yielded a value of 2697 tCO2e while the DEFRA-based assessment resulted in a lower CF of 1526 ton of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e). It is noted that most of the carbon emissions in the university is due to electricity consumption followed by natural gas usage. A prioritized action plan could be reducing the electricity consumption with automated lighting and laboratory equipment, subsequently increasing energy efficiency in the buildings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d9ddc306da2341178ca2ed006c368472 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2602-4217 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Bursa Technical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-d9ddc306da2341178ca2ed006c3684722025-08-20T03:17:59ZengBursa Technical UniversityJournal of Innovative Science and Engineering2602-42172025-06-0191788810.38088/jise.1531963Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical UniversitySomaia Shahin0https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2708-5039Samet ÖZTÜRK1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-1534Bursa Technical UniversityBursa Technical UniversityBursa Technical University (BTU) is committed to achieving sustainability goals and has taken significant steps in this direction. This study was conducted in accordance with the emission factors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the conversion factors of the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The study was carried out in line with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14064 and ISO 14001 standards and in harmony with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), drawing on the experiences of five Turkish universities. This paper provides detailed information on BTU's carbon footprint calculation methodology, the standards used, and its alignment with the SDGs. The application of two distinct emission factors, those of EPA and DEFRA, yielded divergent carbon footprint (CF) values for BTU. The EPA approach yielded a value of 2697 tCO2e while the DEFRA-based assessment resulted in a lower CF of 1526 ton of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e). It is noted that most of the carbon emissions in the university is due to electricity consumption followed by natural gas usage. A prioritized action plan could be reducing the electricity consumption with automated lighting and laboratory equipment, subsequently increasing energy efficiency in the buildings.http://jise.btu.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/4139383sustainabilitycarbon footprintepadefraghgsdgs |
| spellingShingle | Somaia Shahin Samet ÖZTÜRK Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering sustainability carbon footprint epa defra ghg sdgs |
| title | Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University |
| title_full | Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University |
| title_fullStr | Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University |
| title_short | Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Assessment Using EPA and DEFRA: A Case Study of Bursa Technical University |
| title_sort | comprehensive carbon footprint assessment using epa and defra a case study of bursa technical university |
| topic | sustainability carbon footprint epa defra ghg sdgs |
| url | http://jise.btu.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/4139383 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT somaiashahin comprehensivecarbonfootprintassessmentusingepaanddefraacasestudyofbursatechnicaluniversity AT sametozturk comprehensivecarbonfootprintassessmentusingepaanddefraacasestudyofbursatechnicaluniversity |