Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study
Background and objectives Peer review is ubiquitous in evaluating scientific research. While peer review of manuscripts submitted to journals has been widely studied, there has been relatively less attention paid to peer review of grant applications (despite how crucial peer review is to researchers...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Karim M Khan, Clare L Ardern, Joanie Sims Gould, Anne M Lasinsky, Adrian Mota |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/2/e091666.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
by: Joanie Sims Gould, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Negotiating connections, confinements, and neighbourhood places: Older adults’ everyday well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
by: Callista A. Ottoni, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
An experimental study of simulated grant peer review: Gender differences and psychometric characteristics of proposal scores.
by: Karen B Schmaling, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Registered report protocol: Factors associated with inter-rater agreement in grant peer review.
by: Jan-Ole Hesselberg, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Registered report protocol: Factors associated with inter-rater agreement in grant peer review
by: Jan-Ole Hesselberg, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)