Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background: Dysphonia impairs verbal communication of the sufferer, which can lead to social isolation, depression, and reduced quality of life. Evaluation of voice handicap and emotional impact of dysphonia are not routinely consider in our laryngology and voice clinics, despite the fact that abo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Auwal Adamu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-10-01
Series:Amrita Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/amjm/fulltext/2022/18040/evaluation_of_voice_handicap_and_emotional_status.4.aspx
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850264902725271552
author Auwal Adamu
author_facet Auwal Adamu
author_sort Auwal Adamu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Dysphonia impairs verbal communication of the sufferer, which can lead to social isolation, depression, and reduced quality of life. Evaluation of voice handicap and emotional impact of dysphonia are not routinely consider in our laryngology and voice clinics, despite the fact that about 50% to 60% of patients with dysphonia have social and psychological problems. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the voice handicap and emotional status among dysphonic and non-dysphonic individuals in our environment. Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional study that included dysphonic patients and non-dysphonic individuals matched for age and gender. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire was used to assess the voice handicap and emotional status of the participants. The mean VHI score of dysphonic and non-dysphonic participants was compared. Results: Ninety dysphonic patients and equal number of non-dysphonic controls completed the study. The mean VHI score dysphonic patients was higher (46.8 ± 17.7) than that of the controls (5.2 ± 3.9), and there was a statistical significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.000). Most of the dysphonic patients 69(77.8%) had poor emotional status, while most of the controls had good emotional status 83(92.3%). Conclusion: This study found high Voice Handicap Index and poor emotional status among dysphonic patients compared to controls. Therefore, patients with dysphonia should be reviewed by a psychologist in order to address the emotional aspect of their problem.
format Article
id doaj-art-d9919dc1d96a4c1fb9cd62bbe1e4650f
institution OA Journals
issn 2772-2805
language English
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Amrita Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d9919dc1d96a4c1fb9cd62bbe1e4650f2025-08-20T01:54:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAmrita Journal of Medicine2772-28052022-10-0118411713310.4103/AMJM.AMJM_40_22Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional SurveyAuwal AdamuBackground: Dysphonia impairs verbal communication of the sufferer, which can lead to social isolation, depression, and reduced quality of life. Evaluation of voice handicap and emotional impact of dysphonia are not routinely consider in our laryngology and voice clinics, despite the fact that about 50% to 60% of patients with dysphonia have social and psychological problems. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the voice handicap and emotional status among dysphonic and non-dysphonic individuals in our environment. Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional study that included dysphonic patients and non-dysphonic individuals matched for age and gender. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire was used to assess the voice handicap and emotional status of the participants. The mean VHI score of dysphonic and non-dysphonic participants was compared. Results: Ninety dysphonic patients and equal number of non-dysphonic controls completed the study. The mean VHI score dysphonic patients was higher (46.8 ± 17.7) than that of the controls (5.2 ± 3.9), and there was a statistical significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.000). Most of the dysphonic patients 69(77.8%) had poor emotional status, while most of the controls had good emotional status 83(92.3%). Conclusion: This study found high Voice Handicap Index and poor emotional status among dysphonic patients compared to controls. Therefore, patients with dysphonia should be reviewed by a psychologist in order to address the emotional aspect of their problem.https://journals.lww.com/amjm/fulltext/2022/18040/evaluation_of_voice_handicap_and_emotional_status.4.aspxdysphonia; emotional status; voice handicap index score
spellingShingle Auwal Adamu
Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
Amrita Journal of Medicine
dysphonia; emotional status; voice handicap index score
title Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_fullStr Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_short Evaluation of Voice Handicap and Emotional Status among Dysphonic and Non-Dysphonic Individuals A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_sort evaluation of voice handicap and emotional status among dysphonic and non dysphonic individuals a cross sectional survey
topic dysphonia; emotional status; voice handicap index score
url https://journals.lww.com/amjm/fulltext/2022/18040/evaluation_of_voice_handicap_and_emotional_status.4.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT auwaladamu evaluationofvoicehandicapandemotionalstatusamongdysphonicandnondysphonicindividualsacrosssectionalsurvey