Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The currently reported prevalence of dermatophytosis (superficial mycoses) in India ranges from 6.09%–61.5%. Due to the rising cases of treatment failure, chronic recalcitrant disease, and frequent relapses, standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes has become...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sudeshna Das, Deepti Rawat, Ravinder Kaur, Vibhu Mendiratta, Pradeep K. Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-05-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850235463039713280
author Sudeshna Das
Deepti Rawat
Ravinder Kaur
Vibhu Mendiratta
Pradeep K. Singh
author_facet Sudeshna Das
Deepti Rawat
Ravinder Kaur
Vibhu Mendiratta
Pradeep K. Singh
author_sort Sudeshna Das
collection DOAJ
description Background: The currently reported prevalence of dermatophytosis (superficial mycoses) in India ranges from 6.09%–61.5%. Due to the rising cases of treatment failure, chronic recalcitrant disease, and frequent relapses, standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes has become important. Aims and Objectives: To determine the in vitro susceptibility profile of different isolates of dermatophytes to eight antifungal drugs by broth microdilution method. Materials and Methods: In total, 236 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of suffering from dermatophytosis were included in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Nails, hair clippings, and skin scrapings were tested by the KOH mount and cultured on Sabouraud’s agar medium (incubated at 25°C and 37°C) and dermatophyte test media. The dermatophytes isolated were identified based on the morphology of the colony growth as observed in the lacto phenol cotton blue (LPCB) mount, temperature tolerance, urease production, and in vitro hair perforation test. Antifungal susceptibility test was performed for dermatophytes against eight antifungal agents (terbinafine, griseofulvin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, luliconazole, and posaconazole) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M38-3rd edition). Results: Trichophyton rubrum was the most common dermatophyte species isolated in the study. Triazoles were found to have low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), except fluconazole, which showed very high MIC values with 55.2% isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 32 μg/mL). Luliconazole had the lowest MIC90 (0.003 μg/mL). There was a wide variation in the MIC values for terbinafine (0.06–16 μg/mL) and griseofulvin (0.125–8 μg/mL) with 13.1% and 52.6% of isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) to terbinafine and griseofulvin respectively. Conclusion: The present study showcases the MIC values of eight anti-fungal drugs used for the treatment of different species of dermatophytes. It was observed that the commonly used antifungals such as fluconazole, griseofulvin, and terbinafine showed high MIC values compared to newer drugs such as luliconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. More studies based on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) should be performed to understand the changing epidemiology of dermatophytosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-d98f9287f5844751b4ad1d04009e2efd
institution OA Journals
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
spelling doaj-art-d98f9287f5844751b4ad1d04009e2efd2025-08-20T02:02:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112025-05-0170311712410.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional StudySudeshna DasDeepti RawatRavinder KaurVibhu MendirattaPradeep K. SinghBackground: The currently reported prevalence of dermatophytosis (superficial mycoses) in India ranges from 6.09%–61.5%. Due to the rising cases of treatment failure, chronic recalcitrant disease, and frequent relapses, standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes has become important. Aims and Objectives: To determine the in vitro susceptibility profile of different isolates of dermatophytes to eight antifungal drugs by broth microdilution method. Materials and Methods: In total, 236 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of suffering from dermatophytosis were included in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Nails, hair clippings, and skin scrapings were tested by the KOH mount and cultured on Sabouraud’s agar medium (incubated at 25°C and 37°C) and dermatophyte test media. The dermatophytes isolated were identified based on the morphology of the colony growth as observed in the lacto phenol cotton blue (LPCB) mount, temperature tolerance, urease production, and in vitro hair perforation test. Antifungal susceptibility test was performed for dermatophytes against eight antifungal agents (terbinafine, griseofulvin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, luliconazole, and posaconazole) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M38-3rd edition). Results: Trichophyton rubrum was the most common dermatophyte species isolated in the study. Triazoles were found to have low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), except fluconazole, which showed very high MIC values with 55.2% isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 32 μg/mL). Luliconazole had the lowest MIC90 (0.003 μg/mL). There was a wide variation in the MIC values for terbinafine (0.06–16 μg/mL) and griseofulvin (0.125–8 μg/mL) with 13.1% and 52.6% of isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) to terbinafine and griseofulvin respectively. Conclusion: The present study showcases the MIC values of eight anti-fungal drugs used for the treatment of different species of dermatophytes. It was observed that the commonly used antifungals such as fluconazole, griseofulvin, and terbinafine showed high MIC values compared to newer drugs such as luliconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. More studies based on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) should be performed to understand the changing epidemiology of dermatophytosis.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23antifungal susceptibility testdermatophytosisluliconazoleminimum inhibitory concentrationtrichophyton
spellingShingle Sudeshna Das
Deepti Rawat
Ravinder Kaur
Vibhu Mendiratta
Pradeep K. Singh
Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
Indian Journal of Dermatology
antifungal susceptibility test
dermatophytosis
luliconazole
minimum inhibitory concentration
trichophyton
title Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparative analysis of in vitro susceptibility profile of dermatophytes against 8 antifungal agents a cross sectional study
topic antifungal susceptibility test
dermatophytosis
luliconazole
minimum inhibitory concentration
trichophyton
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23
work_keys_str_mv AT sudeshnadas comparativeanalysisofinvitrosusceptibilityprofileofdermatophytesagainst8antifungalagentsacrosssectionalstudy
AT deeptirawat comparativeanalysisofinvitrosusceptibilityprofileofdermatophytesagainst8antifungalagentsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ravinderkaur comparativeanalysisofinvitrosusceptibilityprofileofdermatophytesagainst8antifungalagentsacrosssectionalstudy
AT vibhumendiratta comparativeanalysisofinvitrosusceptibilityprofileofdermatophytesagainst8antifungalagentsacrosssectionalstudy
AT pradeepksingh comparativeanalysisofinvitrosusceptibilityprofileofdermatophytesagainst8antifungalagentsacrosssectionalstudy