Difference between magnetic versus conventional ureteral stents in morbidity and efficiency after double J stents removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Context: Ureteral stents are crucial in urological surgery, promoting urine passage and preventing obstruction. They have undergone design, material, and covering changes to minimize pain and enhance efficiency. Researchers are exploring the use of magnetic stents, which use magnets attached to the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Kharisma Prasetya Adhyatma, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli, Elbert, Felix Khosasi, Dianita Halimah Harahap |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Urology Annals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ua.ua_99_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Exploring Condition-Specific Variability in the Ureteral Stent Microbiome
by: Ava Mousavi, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Bioabsorbable ureteral stents: current state-of-the-art
by: A. A. Aloyan, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Effect of Metallic Ureteric Stents on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction
by: Mahima Tellambura, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
«Forgotten» encrusted ureteral stents
by: R. S. Frantsev, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Peak stent discomfort occurs early and ureteral stent with distal loop design has less pain–A pilot prospective randomised single-blinded trial over 2 weeks
by: Kheng Sit Lim, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)