Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience

Background/Aim. Laser in situ keratamileusis (LASIK) is the most commonly used refractive surgical method worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of LASIK in the correction of myopia and hyperopia. Methods. The study included myopic and hyperopic eyes with preope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vukosavljević Miroslav, Milivojević Milorad, Resan Mirko, Cerović Vesna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade 2009-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2009/0042-84500912979V.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849472288059031552
author Vukosavljević Miroslav
Milivojević Milorad
Resan Mirko
Cerović Vesna
author_facet Vukosavljević Miroslav
Milivojević Milorad
Resan Mirko
Cerović Vesna
author_sort Vukosavljević Miroslav
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aim. Laser in situ keratamileusis (LASIK) is the most commonly used refractive surgical method worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of LASIK in the correction of myopia and hyperopia. Methods. The study included myopic and hyperopic eyes with preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) = 1 (20/20), of the total number of 322 divided into 2 groups - 1) myopic eyes (n = 241) which were divided into 4 subgroups according to the myopia strength: a) ≤ -1.75 D (n = 23), b) from -2 to -3.75 D (n = 81), c) from -4 to -6.75 D (n = 113), d) ≥ -7 D (n = 24); 2) hyperopic eyes (n = 81) which were divided into 3 subgroups according to the hyperopia strength: a) ≤ +1.75D (n = 10), b) from +2 to +3.75 D (n = 46), c) ≥ +4 D (n = 25). Myopic and hyperopic eyes with preoperative BCVA ≤ 0.9 (eyes with ambliopia) were excluded from the study, as well as eyes with astigmatism > 1.5 D. To assess the effectiveness of LASIK we examined the percentage of eyes in the mentioned subgroups, which derived uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 6 month after the intervention to the following: a) UCVA = 1 (20/20) and b) UCVA ≥ 0.5 (20/40). To assess the safety of LASIK we examined the frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications. A prospective study was performed in a 6-months follow-up period. Results. Refractive spherical equivalent (RSE) of myopic eyes was in the range from -0.75 D to -12 D. In the first subgroup preoperative mean value of RSE with standard deviation (mean RSE ± SD) was -1.39 ± 0.36 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 100% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20. In the second subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -2.85 ± 0.50 D, and 6 months after LASIK 93% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the third subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -5.03 ± 0.75 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 90% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the fourth subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -7.68 ± 1.03 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 96% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. Refractive spherical equivalent of hyperopic eyes was in the range from +1 D to +6 D. In the first subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +1.50 ± 0.30 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 90% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the second subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +2.65 ± 0.46 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 87% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 96% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the third subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +4.62 ± 0.68 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 64% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In our study intraoperative complications appeared in 6 eyes (1.86%): thin flap in 2 eyes (0.62%) and epithelial defects in 4 eyes (1.24%), yet postoperative complications appeared in 10 eyes (3.10%): flap folds in 2 eyes (0.62%), epithelial ingrowth in 4 eyes (1.24%) and regression in 4 eyes (1.24%). Conclusion. LASIK is effective and safe refractive surgical method for correcting myopia up to -12 D and hyperopia up to +6 D.
format Article
id doaj-art-d8c45cd10a874c28a87b36ed0d7aad93
institution Kabale University
issn 0042-8450
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj-art-d8c45cd10a874c28a87b36ed0d7aad932025-08-20T03:24:35ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502009-01-01661297998410.2298/VSP0912979VLaser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experienceVukosavljević MiroslavMilivojević MiloradResan MirkoCerović VesnaBackground/Aim. Laser in situ keratamileusis (LASIK) is the most commonly used refractive surgical method worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of LASIK in the correction of myopia and hyperopia. Methods. The study included myopic and hyperopic eyes with preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) = 1 (20/20), of the total number of 322 divided into 2 groups - 1) myopic eyes (n = 241) which were divided into 4 subgroups according to the myopia strength: a) ≤ -1.75 D (n = 23), b) from -2 to -3.75 D (n = 81), c) from -4 to -6.75 D (n = 113), d) ≥ -7 D (n = 24); 2) hyperopic eyes (n = 81) which were divided into 3 subgroups according to the hyperopia strength: a) ≤ +1.75D (n = 10), b) from +2 to +3.75 D (n = 46), c) ≥ +4 D (n = 25). Myopic and hyperopic eyes with preoperative BCVA ≤ 0.9 (eyes with ambliopia) were excluded from the study, as well as eyes with astigmatism > 1.5 D. To assess the effectiveness of LASIK we examined the percentage of eyes in the mentioned subgroups, which derived uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 6 month after the intervention to the following: a) UCVA = 1 (20/20) and b) UCVA ≥ 0.5 (20/40). To assess the safety of LASIK we examined the frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications. A prospective study was performed in a 6-months follow-up period. Results. Refractive spherical equivalent (RSE) of myopic eyes was in the range from -0.75 D to -12 D. In the first subgroup preoperative mean value of RSE with standard deviation (mean RSE ± SD) was -1.39 ± 0.36 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 100% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20. In the second subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -2.85 ± 0.50 D, and 6 months after LASIK 93% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the third subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -5.03 ± 0.75 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 90% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the fourth subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was -7.68 ± 1.03 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 96% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. Refractive spherical equivalent of hyperopic eyes was in the range from +1 D to +6 D. In the first subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +1.50 ± 0.30 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 90% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the second subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +2.65 ± 0.46 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 87% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 96% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In the third subgroup preoperative mean RSE ± SD was +4.62 ± 0.68 D, and 6 months after the LASIK 64% of the eyes had UCVA = 20/20, but 100% of the eyes had UCVA ≥ 20/40. In our study intraoperative complications appeared in 6 eyes (1.86%): thin flap in 2 eyes (0.62%) and epithelial defects in 4 eyes (1.24%), yet postoperative complications appeared in 10 eyes (3.10%): flap folds in 2 eyes (0.62%), epithelial ingrowth in 4 eyes (1.24%) and regression in 4 eyes (1.24%). Conclusion. LASIK is effective and safe refractive surgical method for correcting myopia up to -12 D and hyperopia up to +6 D.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2009/0042-84500912979V.pdfkeratomileusis, laser in situmyopiahyperopiacorneal diseasesvision tests
spellingShingle Vukosavljević Miroslav
Milivojević Milorad
Resan Mirko
Cerović Vesna
Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
keratomileusis, laser in situ
myopia
hyperopia
corneal diseases
vision tests
title Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
title_full Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
title_fullStr Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
title_full_unstemmed Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
title_short Laser in situ keratomyleusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia and hypermetropia: Our one year experience
title_sort laser in situ keratomyleusis lasik for correction of myopia and hypermetropia our one year experience
topic keratomileusis, laser in situ
myopia
hyperopia
corneal diseases
vision tests
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2009/0042-84500912979V.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vukosavljevicmiroslav laserinsitukeratomyleusislasikforcorrectionofmyopiaandhypermetropiaouroneyearexperience
AT milivojevicmilorad laserinsitukeratomyleusislasikforcorrectionofmyopiaandhypermetropiaouroneyearexperience
AT resanmirko laserinsitukeratomyleusislasikforcorrectionofmyopiaandhypermetropiaouroneyearexperience
AT cerovicvesna laserinsitukeratomyleusislasikforcorrectionofmyopiaandhypermetropiaouroneyearexperience