A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems
This review provides a comprehensive and multidisciplinary overview of recent advancements in solar tracking systems (STSs) aimed at improving the efficiency and adaptability of photovoltaic (PV) technologies. The study systematically classifies solar trackers based on tracking axes (fixed, single-a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2553 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849327669607399424 |
|---|---|
| author | Reza Sadeghi Mattia Parenti Samuele Memme Marco Fossa Stefano Morchio |
| author_facet | Reza Sadeghi Mattia Parenti Samuele Memme Marco Fossa Stefano Morchio |
| author_sort | Reza Sadeghi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This review provides a comprehensive and multidisciplinary overview of recent advancements in solar tracking systems (STSs) aimed at improving the efficiency and adaptability of photovoltaic (PV) technologies. The study systematically classifies solar trackers based on tracking axes (fixed, single-axis, and dual-axis), drive mechanisms (active, passive, semi-passive, manual, and chronological), and control strategies (open-loop, closed-loop, hybrid, and AI-based). Fixed-tilt PV systems serve as a baseline, with single-axis trackers achieving 20–35% higher energy yield, and dual-axis trackers offering energy gains ranging from 30% to 45% depending on geographic and climatic conditions. In particular, dual-axis systems outperform others in high-latitude and equatorial regions due to their ability to follow both azimuth and elevation angles throughout the year. Sensor technologies such as LDRs, UV sensors, and fiber-optic sensors are compared in terms of precision and environmental adaptability, while microcontroller platforms—including Arduino, ATmega, and PLC-based controllers—are evaluated for their scalability and application scope. Intelligent tracking systems, especially those leveraging machine learning and predictive analytics, demonstrate additional energy gains up to 7.83% under cloudy conditions compared to conventional algorithms. The review also emphasizes adaptive tracking strategies for backtracking, high-latitude conditions, and cloudy weather, alongside emerging applications in agrivoltaics, where solar tracking not only enhances energy capture but also improves shading control, crop productivity, and rainwater distribution. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate tracking strategies based on site-specific factors, economic constraints, and climatic conditions, while highlighting the central role of solar tracking technologies in achieving greater solar penetration and supporting global sustainability goals, particularly SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d8bef06fc5cb4e4e9686b98bd695343d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj-art-d8bef06fc5cb4e4e9686b98bd695343d2025-08-20T03:47:48ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-05-011810255310.3390/en18102553A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking SystemsReza Sadeghi0Mattia Parenti1Samuele Memme2Marco Fossa3Stefano Morchio4Dime Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, Via Opera Pia 15a, 16145 Genova, ItalyDime Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, Via Opera Pia 15a, 16145 Genova, ItalyDime Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, Via Opera Pia 15a, 16145 Genova, ItalyDime Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, Via Opera Pia 15a, 16145 Genova, ItalyDime Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, Via Opera Pia 15a, 16145 Genova, ItalyThis review provides a comprehensive and multidisciplinary overview of recent advancements in solar tracking systems (STSs) aimed at improving the efficiency and adaptability of photovoltaic (PV) technologies. The study systematically classifies solar trackers based on tracking axes (fixed, single-axis, and dual-axis), drive mechanisms (active, passive, semi-passive, manual, and chronological), and control strategies (open-loop, closed-loop, hybrid, and AI-based). Fixed-tilt PV systems serve as a baseline, with single-axis trackers achieving 20–35% higher energy yield, and dual-axis trackers offering energy gains ranging from 30% to 45% depending on geographic and climatic conditions. In particular, dual-axis systems outperform others in high-latitude and equatorial regions due to their ability to follow both azimuth and elevation angles throughout the year. Sensor technologies such as LDRs, UV sensors, and fiber-optic sensors are compared in terms of precision and environmental adaptability, while microcontroller platforms—including Arduino, ATmega, and PLC-based controllers—are evaluated for their scalability and application scope. Intelligent tracking systems, especially those leveraging machine learning and predictive analytics, demonstrate additional energy gains up to 7.83% under cloudy conditions compared to conventional algorithms. The review also emphasizes adaptive tracking strategies for backtracking, high-latitude conditions, and cloudy weather, alongside emerging applications in agrivoltaics, where solar tracking not only enhances energy capture but also improves shading control, crop productivity, and rainwater distribution. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate tracking strategies based on site-specific factors, economic constraints, and climatic conditions, while highlighting the central role of solar tracking technologies in achieving greater solar penetration and supporting global sustainability goals, particularly SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2553solar tracking systemcontrol strategiesoptical camerasagrivoltaics |
| spellingShingle | Reza Sadeghi Mattia Parenti Samuele Memme Marco Fossa Stefano Morchio A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems Energies solar tracking system control strategies optical cameras agrivoltaics |
| title | A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems |
| title_full | A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems |
| title_fullStr | A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems |
| title_short | A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems |
| title_sort | review and comparative analysis of solar tracking systems |
| topic | solar tracking system control strategies optical cameras agrivoltaics |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2553 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rezasadeghi areviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT mattiaparenti areviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT samuelememme areviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT marcofossa areviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT stefanomorchio areviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT rezasadeghi reviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT mattiaparenti reviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT samuelememme reviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT marcofossa reviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems AT stefanomorchio reviewandcomparativeanalysisofsolartrackingsystems |