Archive as Catastrophe

This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a col...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Caio Yurgel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Milano University Press 2021-07-01
Series:Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/20610
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849761069244874752
author Caio Yurgel
author_facet Caio Yurgel
author_sort Caio Yurgel
collection DOAJ
description This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a collection and an archive, positing that what makes an archive radical is precisely the fact it is not a collection. A collection is concerned with the accumulation of property and the preservation of the status quo. It is an aspirational – or, to use Benjamin’s words, bourgeois – endeavor: it seeks to protect and preserve itself. An archive, on the other hand, is catastrophic: it should disturb – the archivist most of all. We understand archive here not as an institutional practice, but as an intellectual and artistic method. An archive asks of the archivist: What are you going to do with this? The archive asks the defining question of our capitalist age: why are you accumulating property?
format Article
id doaj-art-d8b60e05afeb4422801281cecdad5dc7
institution DOAJ
issn 2283-7949
language English
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Milano University Press
record_format Article
series Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
spelling doaj-art-d8b60e05afeb4422801281cecdad5dc72025-08-20T03:06:09ZengMilano University PressGlocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation2283-79492021-07-012Archive as CatastropheCaio Yurgel0Duke Kunshan University This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a collection and an archive, positing that what makes an archive radical is precisely the fact it is not a collection. A collection is concerned with the accumulation of property and the preservation of the status quo. It is an aspirational – or, to use Benjamin’s words, bourgeois – endeavor: it seeks to protect and preserve itself. An archive, on the other hand, is catastrophic: it should disturb – the archivist most of all. We understand archive here not as an institutional practice, but as an intellectual and artistic method. An archive asks of the archivist: What are you going to do with this? The archive asks the defining question of our capitalist age: why are you accumulating property? https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/20610archivearbitrarinessaccumulationteleology
spellingShingle Caio Yurgel
Archive as Catastrophe
Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
archive
arbitrariness
accumulation
teleology
title Archive as Catastrophe
title_full Archive as Catastrophe
title_fullStr Archive as Catastrophe
title_full_unstemmed Archive as Catastrophe
title_short Archive as Catastrophe
title_sort archive as catastrophe
topic archive
arbitrariness
accumulation
teleology
url https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/20610
work_keys_str_mv AT caioyurgel archiveascatastrophe