Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period

Abstract Introduction Ureteric injury is a rare but serious, iatrogenic complication of hysterectomy. The risk depends on indication for surgery, predisposing risk factors, and peroperative conditions. Our aims were to evaluate and learn from compensation claims to The Norwegian System of Patient In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merethe Ravlo, Mette Haase Moen, Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm, Marit Lieng, Eszter Vanky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14293
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850211861453078528
author Merethe Ravlo
Mette Haase Moen
Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm
Marit Lieng
Eszter Vanky
author_facet Merethe Ravlo
Mette Haase Moen
Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm
Marit Lieng
Eszter Vanky
author_sort Merethe Ravlo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Ureteric injury is a rare but serious, iatrogenic complication of hysterectomy. The risk depends on indication for surgery, predisposing risk factors, and peroperative conditions. Our aims were to evaluate and learn from compensation claims to The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) for ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomies to predict risk factors, time of identification, symptoms, and consequences, and to relate these cases to injuries registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry. Material and methods A retrospective study of ureteric injuries occurring during hysterectomies, reported to NPE and the Norwegian Patient Registry from 2009 through 2019. Results During the study period, 53 096 hysterectomies were registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry, of which ureteric injury was documented in 643 (1.2%). More ureteric injuries were registered in large hospital trusts than in small trusts (1.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05). NPE received 69 claims due to ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy, comprising 11% of all injuries in the study period. Compensation was approved for 15%. Women who claimed compensation were younger (48.1 ± 8.9 years vs. 55.1 ± 13.6 years, p < 0.01), more likely to have had a benign diagnosis (89.9% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.01), and more likely to have had the ureteric injury recognized after discharge (58.0% vs. 33.0%, p < 0.001) compared with non‐complainants. Identification of the ureters during the hysterectomy was documented in 30% of the NPE patient files. Additional information for the NPE cases included the following. The most common symptoms of unidentified injury were pain (77%), fever (12%), urinary leakage (13%), and anuria (8%). Re‐operation was necessary in 77% of the cases, and 10% of the women lost one kidney. Long‐term consequences after repair, such as loss of a kidney or persistent pain, were seen in 17%. No women died because of the injury. Conclusions The incidence of ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy in Norway was 1.2%; 11% involved a claim for compensation, and 15% of these had their case approved. Most ureteric injuries were not recognized during the hysterectomy. Documentation of peroperative identification of the ureters during hysterectomy was often missing. Vigilance to pain as a postoperative symptom of peroperative unrecognized ureteric injury may result in earlier diagnosis and treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-d8a5c50bc42f47ffb50ffdd272d2915c
institution OA Journals
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-d8a5c50bc42f47ffb50ffdd272d2915c2025-08-20T02:09:28ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122022-01-011011687610.1111/aogs.14293Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year periodMerethe Ravlo0Mette Haase Moen1Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm2Marit Lieng3Eszter Vanky4Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim NorwayDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim NorwayNorwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation Oslo NorwayDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics Oslo University Hospital Oslo NorwayDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim NorwayAbstract Introduction Ureteric injury is a rare but serious, iatrogenic complication of hysterectomy. The risk depends on indication for surgery, predisposing risk factors, and peroperative conditions. Our aims were to evaluate and learn from compensation claims to The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) for ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomies to predict risk factors, time of identification, symptoms, and consequences, and to relate these cases to injuries registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry. Material and methods A retrospective study of ureteric injuries occurring during hysterectomies, reported to NPE and the Norwegian Patient Registry from 2009 through 2019. Results During the study period, 53 096 hysterectomies were registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry, of which ureteric injury was documented in 643 (1.2%). More ureteric injuries were registered in large hospital trusts than in small trusts (1.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05). NPE received 69 claims due to ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy, comprising 11% of all injuries in the study period. Compensation was approved for 15%. Women who claimed compensation were younger (48.1 ± 8.9 years vs. 55.1 ± 13.6 years, p < 0.01), more likely to have had a benign diagnosis (89.9% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.01), and more likely to have had the ureteric injury recognized after discharge (58.0% vs. 33.0%, p < 0.001) compared with non‐complainants. Identification of the ureters during the hysterectomy was documented in 30% of the NPE patient files. Additional information for the NPE cases included the following. The most common symptoms of unidentified injury were pain (77%), fever (12%), urinary leakage (13%), and anuria (8%). Re‐operation was necessary in 77% of the cases, and 10% of the women lost one kidney. Long‐term consequences after repair, such as loss of a kidney or persistent pain, were seen in 17%. No women died because of the injury. Conclusions The incidence of ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy in Norway was 1.2%; 11% involved a claim for compensation, and 15% of these had their case approved. Most ureteric injuries were not recognized during the hysterectomy. Documentation of peroperative identification of the ureters during hysterectomy was often missing. Vigilance to pain as a postoperative symptom of peroperative unrecognized ureteric injury may result in earlier diagnosis and treatment.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14293claims for compensationhysterectomyureteric injury
spellingShingle Merethe Ravlo
Mette Haase Moen
Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm
Marit Lieng
Eszter Vanky
Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
claims for compensation
hysterectomy
ureteric injury
title Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
title_full Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
title_fullStr Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
title_full_unstemmed Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
title_short Ureteric injuries during hysterectomy—A Norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11‐year period
title_sort ureteric injuries during hysterectomy a norwegian retrospective study of occurrence and claims for compensation over an 11 year period
topic claims for compensation
hysterectomy
ureteric injury
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14293
work_keys_str_mv AT meretheravlo uretericinjuriesduringhysterectomyanorwegianretrospectivestudyofoccurrenceandclaimsforcompensationoveran11yearperiod
AT mettehaasemoen uretericinjuriesduringhysterectomyanorwegianretrospectivestudyofoccurrenceandclaimsforcompensationoveran11yearperiod
AT idarashidakhanbukholm uretericinjuriesduringhysterectomyanorwegianretrospectivestudyofoccurrenceandclaimsforcompensationoveran11yearperiod
AT maritlieng uretericinjuriesduringhysterectomyanorwegianretrospectivestudyofoccurrenceandclaimsforcompensationoveran11yearperiod
AT esztervanky uretericinjuriesduringhysterectomyanorwegianretrospectivestudyofoccurrenceandclaimsforcompensationoveran11yearperiod