Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm

This article combines research strands on international norms, framing, and riskification to elaborate the framing methods used by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) to effect an anti-nuclear weapons norm around the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Harijanto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-01-01
Series:Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/25751654.2025.2494869
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427139509616640
author Christian Harijanto
author_facet Christian Harijanto
author_sort Christian Harijanto
collection DOAJ
description This article combines research strands on international norms, framing, and riskification to elaborate the framing methods used by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) to effect an anti-nuclear weapons norm around the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The anti-nuclear weapons norm goes beyond the prevailing non-use norm by prohibiting all activities related to nuclear weapons. With riskification, an issue is turned into a risk, with the associated danger characterized as less than existential, lacking immediacy, and future-oriented. Risks cannot be eradicated and can only be managed; the management of risks is oriented inward toward the referent object, for example, by strengthening its resilience. By employing framing analyses from social movement theory, an examination into ICAN’s diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framings in its three stages of norm formulation, formalization, and cascade finds ICAN’s depiction of the danger posed by nuclear weapons as well as its proposed solution as a form of riskification. It also reveals that while the framing target audience heavily determines the ICAN’s diagnostic and prognostic framings, its motivational framing relies on current global events to justify its proposed collective action.
format Article
id doaj-art-d89736a445874a02b9cc1629a8267d5a
institution Kabale University
issn 2575-1654
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
spelling doaj-art-d89736a445874a02b9cc1629a8267d5a2025-08-20T03:29:06ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament2575-16542025-01-018121423810.1080/25751654.2025.2494869Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons NormChristian Harijanto0School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry, Curtin University, Perth, AustraliaThis article combines research strands on international norms, framing, and riskification to elaborate the framing methods used by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) to effect an anti-nuclear weapons norm around the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The anti-nuclear weapons norm goes beyond the prevailing non-use norm by prohibiting all activities related to nuclear weapons. With riskification, an issue is turned into a risk, with the associated danger characterized as less than existential, lacking immediacy, and future-oriented. Risks cannot be eradicated and can only be managed; the management of risks is oriented inward toward the referent object, for example, by strengthening its resilience. By employing framing analyses from social movement theory, an examination into ICAN’s diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framings in its three stages of norm formulation, formalization, and cascade finds ICAN’s depiction of the danger posed by nuclear weapons as well as its proposed solution as a form of riskification. It also reveals that while the framing target audience heavily determines the ICAN’s diagnostic and prognostic framings, its motivational framing relies on current global events to justify its proposed collective action.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/25751654.2025.2494869International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear WeaponsTreaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weaponsriskificationframingnuclear deterrencenon-use norm
spellingShingle Christian Harijanto
Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
riskification
framing
nuclear deterrence
non-use norm
title Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
title_full Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
title_fullStr Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
title_full_unstemmed Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
title_short Framing Norm Through Riskification: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons and the Anti-Nuclear Weapons Norm
title_sort framing norm through riskification the international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons and the anti nuclear weapons norm
topic International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
riskification
framing
nuclear deterrence
non-use norm
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/25751654.2025.2494869
work_keys_str_mv AT christianharijanto framingnormthroughriskificationtheinternationalcampaigntoabolishnuclearweaponsandtheantinuclearweaponsnorm