Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China

Ying Chen,1 Jiahua Pan,2 Yan Zhong,3 Bin Wu,1 Mengxia Yan,4 Ruiyun Zhang2 1Clinical Research Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong Univer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Y, Pan J, Zhong Y, Wu B, Yan M, Zhang R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2024-12-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/resources-utilization-assessment-and-cost-minimization-analysis-of-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEOR
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850119129647808512
author Chen Y
Pan J
Zhong Y
Wu B
Yan M
Zhang R
author_facet Chen Y
Pan J
Zhong Y
Wu B
Yan M
Zhang R
author_sort Chen Y
collection DOAJ
description Ying Chen,1 Jiahua Pan,2 Yan Zhong,3 Bin Wu,1 Mengxia Yan,4 Ruiyun Zhang2 1Clinical Research Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200000, People’s Republic of China; 3China Association for Promotion of Health Science and Technology, Beijing, 100000, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Pharmacy, Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Ruiyun Zhang, Email 19610@renji.comObjective: Prostate Cancer can be treated with various formulations of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists (GnRHa), but cost analyses of these treatments in China are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the differences in cost and resource utilization between various formulations of GnRHa for Prostate Cancer by conducting a resource utilization assessment and cost minimization analysis.Methods: From the perspective of society and medical healthcare, this study used the cost minimization model to generate cost and resource estimates for GnRHa drug acquisition and administration for “Current practice” and for a “Base case” scenario. In the “Base case” scenario, all of the patients who were receiving 1-monthly or 3-monthly GnRHa therapy in “Current practice” switched to a 6-monthly formulation triptorelin. Cost/Resource estimates were calculated per patient per administration and scaled to annualized population levels. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the uncertainty of the model variables and applied assumptions.Results: From a societal perspective, if all 1-monthly and 3-monthly formulations of GnRHa were switched to a 6-monthly formulation triptorelin, it is conservatively estimated that the annual societal cost could be reduced by ¥ 13,382,951.13, with an average annual cost savings of ¥ 46.53 per patient. Additionally, the 6-monthly formulation could save 3,608,973.91 hours annually, translating to an average time savings of 12.55 hours per patient, reducing treatment time by 78%. From a healthcare system perspective, if the introduction of the 6-monthly formulation of GnRHa is delayed, it would lead to an annual increase of ¥ 94 million in medical costs, and require an additional 64,445.96 working days for doctors and nurses. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated the model’s robustness, showing the 6-monthly GnRHa remains cost-effective across various parameter changes, with drug price being the most influential factor.Conclusion: Compared to current 1-monthly and 3-monthly formulations, the 6-monthly GnRHa can reduce the total burden associated with prostate cancer treatment.Keywords: triptorelin, prostate cancer, cost-minimization, budget impact
format Article
id doaj-art-d887b1cb9a4b49fa8beae496836a2c6e
institution OA Journals
issn 1178-6981
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-d887b1cb9a4b49fa8beae496836a2c6e2025-08-20T02:35:43ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812024-12-01Volume 1686987598334Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in ChinaChen YPan JZhong YWu BYan MZhang RYing Chen,1 Jiahua Pan,2 Yan Zhong,3 Bin Wu,1 Mengxia Yan,4 Ruiyun Zhang2 1Clinical Research Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200000, People’s Republic of China; 3China Association for Promotion of Health Science and Technology, Beijing, 100000, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Pharmacy, Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Ruiyun Zhang, Email 19610@renji.comObjective: Prostate Cancer can be treated with various formulations of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists (GnRHa), but cost analyses of these treatments in China are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the differences in cost and resource utilization between various formulations of GnRHa for Prostate Cancer by conducting a resource utilization assessment and cost minimization analysis.Methods: From the perspective of society and medical healthcare, this study used the cost minimization model to generate cost and resource estimates for GnRHa drug acquisition and administration for “Current practice” and for a “Base case” scenario. In the “Base case” scenario, all of the patients who were receiving 1-monthly or 3-monthly GnRHa therapy in “Current practice” switched to a 6-monthly formulation triptorelin. Cost/Resource estimates were calculated per patient per administration and scaled to annualized population levels. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the uncertainty of the model variables and applied assumptions.Results: From a societal perspective, if all 1-monthly and 3-monthly formulations of GnRHa were switched to a 6-monthly formulation triptorelin, it is conservatively estimated that the annual societal cost could be reduced by ¥ 13,382,951.13, with an average annual cost savings of ¥ 46.53 per patient. Additionally, the 6-monthly formulation could save 3,608,973.91 hours annually, translating to an average time savings of 12.55 hours per patient, reducing treatment time by 78%. From a healthcare system perspective, if the introduction of the 6-monthly formulation of GnRHa is delayed, it would lead to an annual increase of ¥ 94 million in medical costs, and require an additional 64,445.96 working days for doctors and nurses. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated the model’s robustness, showing the 6-monthly GnRHa remains cost-effective across various parameter changes, with drug price being the most influential factor.Conclusion: Compared to current 1-monthly and 3-monthly formulations, the 6-monthly GnRHa can reduce the total burden associated with prostate cancer treatment.Keywords: triptorelin, prostate cancer, cost-minimization, budget impacthttps://www.dovepress.com/resources-utilization-assessment-and-cost-minimization-analysis-of-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEORtriptorelinprostate cancercost-minimizationbudget impact
spellingShingle Chen Y
Pan J
Zhong Y
Wu B
Yan M
Zhang R
Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
triptorelin
prostate cancer
cost-minimization
budget impact
title Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
title_full Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
title_fullStr Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
title_full_unstemmed Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
title_short Resources Utilization Assessment and Cost-Minimization Analysis of the 6-Monthly Formulation of Triptorelin in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in China
title_sort resources utilization assessment and cost minimization analysis of the 6 monthly formulation of triptorelin in the treatment of prostate cancer in china
topic triptorelin
prostate cancer
cost-minimization
budget impact
url https://www.dovepress.com/resources-utilization-assessment-and-cost-minimization-analysis-of-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT cheny resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina
AT panj resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina
AT zhongy resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina
AT wub resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina
AT yanm resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina
AT zhangr resourcesutilizationassessmentandcostminimizationanalysisofthe6monthlyformulationoftriptorelininthetreatmentofprostatecancerinchina