Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
Aim: To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n =...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841544165900419072 |
---|---|
author | Karuna R. Siraparapu X. Nagamaheshwari Veerendra S. Patil Masuna Rukmini Amulya Sainath Adsare Karanam Apoorva Prakash |
author_facet | Karuna R. Siraparapu X. Nagamaheshwari Veerendra S. Patil Masuna Rukmini Amulya Sainath Adsare Karanam Apoorva Prakash |
author_sort | Karuna R. Siraparapu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim:
To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n = 15 per group): ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation. Composite images were made from the superimposition of pre- and post-instrumentation images. Parameters evaluated were total resin removal, centering ability, canal transportation (at the apical, curved, and coronal part), and preparation time.
Results:
Canals prepared with TruNatomy were better centered in the apical part than those prepared with PTN and Flexer heat activation. Flexer heat activation removed significantly more resin at the outer aspect of the maximum point of curvature. PTN and TruNatomy caused similar canal transportations. Instrumentation with Flexer heat activation required more time than with the two other instruments.
Conclusion:
Within the limitations of the study, all instruments were safe to use and preserved the original canal shape well. In the apical part of the canals, TruNatomy obtained the best results with regard to canal transportation.
Clinical Significance:
These findings underscore the importance of considering file selection based on specific canal characteristics and treatment objectives to optimize clinical outcomes in endodontic practice. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d859a5a11af1414ca2ea0947fbccd185 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-d859a5a11af1414ca2ea0947fbccd1852025-01-12T14:05:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3128S313110.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro ApproachKaruna R. SiraparapuX. NagamaheshwariVeerendra S. PatilMasuna Rukmini AmulyaSainath AdsareKaranam Apoorva PrakashAim: To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n = 15 per group): ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation. Composite images were made from the superimposition of pre- and post-instrumentation images. Parameters evaluated were total resin removal, centering ability, canal transportation (at the apical, curved, and coronal part), and preparation time. Results: Canals prepared with TruNatomy were better centered in the apical part than those prepared with PTN and Flexer heat activation. Flexer heat activation removed significantly more resin at the outer aspect of the maximum point of curvature. PTN and TruNatomy caused similar canal transportations. Instrumentation with Flexer heat activation required more time than with the two other instruments. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, all instruments were safe to use and preserved the original canal shape well. In the apical part of the canals, TruNatomy obtained the best results with regard to canal transportation. Clinical Significance: These findings underscore the importance of considering file selection based on specific canal characteristics and treatment objectives to optimize clinical outcomes in endodontic practice.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24nickel-titaniumprotaper nextresin blocksshaping abilitytrunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files |
spellingShingle | Karuna R. Siraparapu X. Nagamaheshwari Veerendra S. Patil Masuna Rukmini Amulya Sainath Adsare Karanam Apoorva Prakash Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences nickel-titanium protaper next resin blocks shaping ability trunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of three file systems for shaping curved canals an in vitro approach |
topic | nickel-titanium protaper next resin blocks shaping ability trunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files |
url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karunarsiraparapu comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach AT xnagamaheshwari comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach AT veerendraspatil comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach AT masunarukminiamulya comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach AT sainathadsare comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach AT karanamapoorvaprakash comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach |