Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach

Aim: To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n =...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karuna R. Siraparapu, X. Nagamaheshwari, Veerendra S. Patil, Masuna Rukmini Amulya, Sainath Adsare, Karanam Apoorva Prakash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544165900419072
author Karuna R. Siraparapu
X. Nagamaheshwari
Veerendra S. Patil
Masuna Rukmini Amulya
Sainath Adsare
Karanam Apoorva Prakash
author_facet Karuna R. Siraparapu
X. Nagamaheshwari
Veerendra S. Patil
Masuna Rukmini Amulya
Sainath Adsare
Karanam Apoorva Prakash
author_sort Karuna R. Siraparapu
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n = 15 per group): ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation. Composite images were made from the superimposition of pre- and post-instrumentation images. Parameters evaluated were total resin removal, centering ability, canal transportation (at the apical, curved, and coronal part), and preparation time. Results: Canals prepared with TruNatomy were better centered in the apical part than those prepared with PTN and Flexer heat activation. Flexer heat activation removed significantly more resin at the outer aspect of the maximum point of curvature. PTN and TruNatomy caused similar canal transportations. Instrumentation with Flexer heat activation required more time than with the two other instruments. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, all instruments were safe to use and preserved the original canal shape well. In the apical part of the canals, TruNatomy obtained the best results with regard to canal transportation. Clinical Significance: These findings underscore the importance of considering file selection based on specific canal characteristics and treatment objectives to optimize clinical outcomes in endodontic practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-d859a5a11af1414ca2ea0947fbccd185
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-d859a5a11af1414ca2ea0947fbccd1852025-01-12T14:05:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3128S313110.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro ApproachKaruna R. SiraparapuX. NagamaheshwariVeerendra S. PatilMasuna Rukmini AmulyaSainath AdsareKaranam Apoorva PrakashAim: To compare and evaluate the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation rotary files in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods: Forty-five severely curved simulated canals in resin blocks were prepared to an apical size of 25 using the following systems (n = 15 per group): ProTaper Next, TruNatomy, and Flexer heat activation. Composite images were made from the superimposition of pre- and post-instrumentation images. Parameters evaluated were total resin removal, centering ability, canal transportation (at the apical, curved, and coronal part), and preparation time. Results: Canals prepared with TruNatomy were better centered in the apical part than those prepared with PTN and Flexer heat activation. Flexer heat activation removed significantly more resin at the outer aspect of the maximum point of curvature. PTN and TruNatomy caused similar canal transportations. Instrumentation with Flexer heat activation required more time than with the two other instruments. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, all instruments were safe to use and preserved the original canal shape well. In the apical part of the canals, TruNatomy obtained the best results with regard to canal transportation. Clinical Significance: These findings underscore the importance of considering file selection based on specific canal characteristics and treatment objectives to optimize clinical outcomes in endodontic practice.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24nickel-titaniumprotaper nextresin blocksshaping abilitytrunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files
spellingShingle Karuna R. Siraparapu
X. Nagamaheshwari
Veerendra S. Patil
Masuna Rukmini Amulya
Sainath Adsare
Karanam Apoorva Prakash
Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
nickel-titanium
protaper next
resin blocks
shaping ability
trunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files
title Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Three File Systems for Shaping Curved Canals: An In Vitro Approach
title_sort comparative evaluation of three file systems for shaping curved canals an in vitro approach
topic nickel-titanium
protaper next
resin blocks
shaping ability
trunatomy and flexer heat activation rotary files
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_24
work_keys_str_mv AT karunarsiraparapu comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach
AT xnagamaheshwari comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach
AT veerendraspatil comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach
AT masunarukminiamulya comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach
AT sainathadsare comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach
AT karanamapoorvaprakash comparativeevaluationofthreefilesystemsforshapingcurvedcanalsaninvitroapproach