Strategies for Living in Houses

The problem of queer housing can never go away because it is a central component of queerness. Queer housing is a contradiction in terms: not even a queer architect can design a queer house. But where does this leave us, as queer people living in a straight hegemony? Where does it leave us as humans...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Colin Ripley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft OPEN Publishing 2017-12-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1903
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849683433189539840
author Colin Ripley
author_facet Colin Ripley
author_sort Colin Ripley
collection DOAJ
description The problem of queer housing can never go away because it is a central component of queerness. Queer housing is a contradiction in terms: not even a queer architect can design a queer house. But where does this leave us, as queer people living in a straight hegemony? Where does it leave us as humans with bodies, craving shelter and safety and a place to live that is in accordance with our experience of self and of living in the world? In this article the author proposes eight architectural strategies for re-occupying the Levittown Cape Cod house from 1947 for queer bodies, minds and hearts. These strategies offer modes by which the key programmatic formal and material components of the Cape Cod House can be attacked, made invalid, or détourned for queer uses, to make of the Cape Cod House a site for our pain, our longing, our anger.
format Article
id doaj-art-d82a80f3afdc437f961394bd515906e9
institution DOAJ
issn 1875-1490
1875-1504
language English
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher TU Delft OPEN Publishing
record_format Article
series Footprint
spelling doaj-art-d82a80f3afdc437f961394bd515906e92025-08-20T03:23:52ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-14901875-15042017-12-019510810.7480/footprint.11.2.19031903Strategies for Living in HousesColin Ripley0Ryerson University, TorontoThe problem of queer housing can never go away because it is a central component of queerness. Queer housing is a contradiction in terms: not even a queer architect can design a queer house. But where does this leave us, as queer people living in a straight hegemony? Where does it leave us as humans with bodies, craving shelter and safety and a place to live that is in accordance with our experience of self and of living in the world? In this article the author proposes eight architectural strategies for re-occupying the Levittown Cape Cod house from 1947 for queer bodies, minds and hearts. These strategies offer modes by which the key programmatic formal and material components of the Cape Cod House can be attacked, made invalid, or détourned for queer uses, to make of the Cape Cod House a site for our pain, our longing, our anger.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1903
spellingShingle Colin Ripley
Strategies for Living in Houses
Footprint
title Strategies for Living in Houses
title_full Strategies for Living in Houses
title_fullStr Strategies for Living in Houses
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for Living in Houses
title_short Strategies for Living in Houses
title_sort strategies for living in houses
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1903
work_keys_str_mv AT colinripley strategiesforlivinginhouses