Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis

Aim To determine stresses generated in the posterior teeth region by two different self-ligating systems, 3M Unitek SmartClip and Damon Q Self-ligating brackets, using the finite element method (FEM). Methodology Computed tomography (CT) scan of maxilla was taken using Mimics software, and the Dicom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohit Awaradi, Roshan M. Sagarkar, Prashantha G Shivamurthy, Silju Mathew, Sharanya Sabrish, Nirajita Bhaduri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-10-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_937_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850177541460983808
author Mohit Awaradi
Roshan M. Sagarkar
Prashantha G Shivamurthy
Silju Mathew
Sharanya Sabrish
Nirajita Bhaduri
author_facet Mohit Awaradi
Roshan M. Sagarkar
Prashantha G Shivamurthy
Silju Mathew
Sharanya Sabrish
Nirajita Bhaduri
author_sort Mohit Awaradi
collection DOAJ
description Aim To determine stresses generated in the posterior teeth region by two different self-ligating systems, 3M Unitek SmartClip and Damon Q Self-ligating brackets, using the finite element method (FEM). Methodology Computed tomography (CT) scan of maxilla was taken using Mimics software, and the Dicom data were imported into Hypermesh 13.0 software to convert it into a geometric model and then into FEM. Physical models of both the brackets were constructed and positioned on the teeth. Post archwire modeling, contact is defined between the bracket slot and 0.014” NiTi arch wire. The final assembled model was exported to ANSYS 12.1 for analysis, and 60 grams of load was applied at the ends of the arch wire. Results On using 0.014” CuNiTi in both the bracket systems, stresses generated on the root surface were found to be maximum on the first molar region, followed by the first premolar, second molar, canine, and second premolar regions. Comparison between the two bracket systems showed differences in the stresses generated, where higher stresses were generated at all regions in the Damon Q bracket system, except the inter-second premolar region. Conclusion Maximum stresses were observed with the 3M Unitek SmartClip bracket system at the second premolar cervical region when compared to the Damon Q system. In both the cortical bone and cancellous bone, maximum stresses were observed at the second premolar cervical in the Damon Q bracket system region.
format Article
id doaj-art-d7fdf2864c7c475389ab2d50d4a53aff
institution OA Journals
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
spelling doaj-art-d7fdf2864c7c475389ab2d50d4a53aff2025-08-20T02:18:57ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032024-10-0135213113510.4103/ijdr.ijdr_937_23Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element AnalysisMohit AwaradiRoshan M. SagarkarPrashantha G ShivamurthySilju MathewSharanya SabrishNirajita BhaduriAim To determine stresses generated in the posterior teeth region by two different self-ligating systems, 3M Unitek SmartClip and Damon Q Self-ligating brackets, using the finite element method (FEM). Methodology Computed tomography (CT) scan of maxilla was taken using Mimics software, and the Dicom data were imported into Hypermesh 13.0 software to convert it into a geometric model and then into FEM. Physical models of both the brackets were constructed and positioned on the teeth. Post archwire modeling, contact is defined between the bracket slot and 0.014” NiTi arch wire. The final assembled model was exported to ANSYS 12.1 for analysis, and 60 grams of load was applied at the ends of the arch wire. Results On using 0.014” CuNiTi in both the bracket systems, stresses generated on the root surface were found to be maximum on the first molar region, followed by the first premolar, second molar, canine, and second premolar regions. Comparison between the two bracket systems showed differences in the stresses generated, where higher stresses were generated at all regions in the Damon Q bracket system, except the inter-second premolar region. Conclusion Maximum stresses were observed with the 3M Unitek SmartClip bracket system at the second premolar cervical region when compared to the Damon Q system. In both the cortical bone and cancellous bone, maximum stresses were observed at the second premolar cervical in the Damon Q bracket system region.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_937_233m unitek smartcliparch expansiondamon q bracketpassive self-ligating system
spellingShingle Mohit Awaradi
Roshan M. Sagarkar
Prashantha G Shivamurthy
Silju Mathew
Sharanya Sabrish
Nirajita Bhaduri
Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
Indian Journal of Dental Research
3m unitek smartclip
arch expansion
damon q bracket
passive self-ligating system
title Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Evaluation of Stresses Generated with Two Different Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Systems – A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort evaluation of stresses generated with two different self ligating orthodontic bracket systems a finite element analysis
topic 3m unitek smartclip
arch expansion
damon q bracket
passive self-ligating system
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_937_23
work_keys_str_mv AT mohitawaradi evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis
AT roshanmsagarkar evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis
AT prashanthagshivamurthy evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis
AT siljumathew evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis
AT sharanyasabrish evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis
AT nirajitabhaduri evaluationofstressesgeneratedwithtwodifferentselfligatingorthodonticbracketsystemsafiniteelementanalysis