Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies
This study aims to compare and contrast the development and trends in traditional handicraft research within domestic and international contexts, offering insights for the future direction of traditional handicrafts in China. By utilizing data from the CNKI and Scopus databases, this research uses v...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2382522 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850103506269110272 |
|---|---|
| author | Haoran Liu Hassan Alli Irwan Syah Md Yusoff |
| author_facet | Haoran Liu Hassan Alli Irwan Syah Md Yusoff |
| author_sort | Haoran Liu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aims to compare and contrast the development and trends in traditional handicraft research within domestic and international contexts, offering insights for the future direction of traditional handicrafts in China. By utilizing data from the CNKI and Scopus databases, this research uses various functions in Citespace, including category analysis, institutional analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and brust keyword detection. These analyses provide a comprehensive comparison of spatio-temporal relationships, publishing institutions, research fields, publication journals, research hotspots, and development trends. Notably, China’s research exhibits significant enthusiasm in areas such as digital preservation, rural revitalization, and targeted poverty alleviation, while foreign research demonstrates a higher emphasis on commercialization, sustainable products, and user perception. Additionally, China emphasizes cultural preservation and inheritance, whereas foreign research places a greater focus on economic value. In terms of research methods, China’s emphasis is on strategic social-level research, while foreign research leans towards technical product and platform research. Combining the insights from both domestic and foreign research highlights two primary characteristics of traditional handicraft application areas: proactive preservation and revitalization efforts in China compared to the commercialization and market orientation emphasis abroad, and a greater focus on cultural preservation in China versus economic value abroad, indicating distinct research content and approaches between the two contexts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d7e39dbdf8e1450a84924236d3ccb811 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2331-1983 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
| spelling | doaj-art-d7e39dbdf8e1450a84924236d3ccb8112025-08-20T02:39:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Arts & Humanities2331-19832024-12-0111110.1080/23311983.2024.2382522Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studiesHaoran Liu0Hassan Alli1Irwan Syah Md Yusoff2Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaFaculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaFaculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaThis study aims to compare and contrast the development and trends in traditional handicraft research within domestic and international contexts, offering insights for the future direction of traditional handicrafts in China. By utilizing data from the CNKI and Scopus databases, this research uses various functions in Citespace, including category analysis, institutional analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and brust keyword detection. These analyses provide a comprehensive comparison of spatio-temporal relationships, publishing institutions, research fields, publication journals, research hotspots, and development trends. Notably, China’s research exhibits significant enthusiasm in areas such as digital preservation, rural revitalization, and targeted poverty alleviation, while foreign research demonstrates a higher emphasis on commercialization, sustainable products, and user perception. Additionally, China emphasizes cultural preservation and inheritance, whereas foreign research places a greater focus on economic value. In terms of research methods, China’s emphasis is on strategic social-level research, while foreign research leans towards technical product and platform research. Combining the insights from both domestic and foreign research highlights two primary characteristics of traditional handicraft application areas: proactive preservation and revitalization efforts in China compared to the commercialization and market orientation emphasis abroad, and a greater focus on cultural preservation in China versus economic value abroad, indicating distinct research content and approaches between the two contexts.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2382522Traditional craftscitespacecomparative researchhotspot trend analysisvisualizationTimothy Clack, University of Oxford, United Kingdom |
| spellingShingle | Haoran Liu Hassan Alli Irwan Syah Md Yusoff Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies Cogent Arts & Humanities Traditional crafts citespace comparative research hotspot trend analysis visualization Timothy Clack, University of Oxford, United Kingdom |
| title | Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies |
| title_full | Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies |
| title_fullStr | Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies |
| title_short | Exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and International traditional handicraft studies |
| title_sort | exploring the divergence in research focus and trends between domestic and international traditional handicraft studies |
| topic | Traditional crafts citespace comparative research hotspot trend analysis visualization Timothy Clack, University of Oxford, United Kingdom |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2382522 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haoranliu exploringthedivergenceinresearchfocusandtrendsbetweendomesticandinternationaltraditionalhandicraftstudies AT hassanalli exploringthedivergenceinresearchfocusandtrendsbetweendomesticandinternationaltraditionalhandicraftstudies AT irwansyahmdyusoff exploringthedivergenceinresearchfocusandtrendsbetweendomesticandinternationaltraditionalhandicraftstudies |