Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study
The asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corrup...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1580234/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849225214965055488 |
|---|---|
| author | Melanie Misamer Claudia Bartels Michael Belz |
| author_facet | Melanie Misamer Claudia Bartels Michael Belz |
| author_sort | Melanie Misamer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corruption rises with everyday working life. In this study, we aimed to assess basic and specific aspects of power sensitivity both for 271 students and 414 professionals, covering (1) general differences for the total sample, (2) differences between both groups and (3) differences between subgroups (semesters, professional years, field of profession; ratings from 0 to 100%). While importance of power sensitivity (94.7%) and professional ethics/principles (91.9%) were rated higher than all other items (p < 0.001), a stark difference was found between the participants’ own vs. the anticipated professional groups’ power sensitivity (73.9% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001). A hypothetical individual change for the worse through the power as social worker was rated significantly lower than all other items on the respective scale (61.5%, p < 0.001). Professionals rated the experience of stereotypical ideas and prejudices towards clients (78.5, 75.2%) to be significantly stronger than students (69.4, 67.4% all p < 0.001). For students, power sensitivity generally increased with semesters (p < 0.001), while it remained stable over professional years for social workers. Differences between fields of profession did not reach significance. In summary, both students and professionals emphasized the importance of power sensitivity, but seemed to show a self-serving bias if they compared themselves to their group – considering a possible corruption effect, this may at least be interpreted as problematic. We discuss room for improvement in terms of sensitization, whether in the context of further training (professionals) or curricula (students). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d7dbd99aae474137a3d6064ac0400b2a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2296-858X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-d7dbd99aae474137a3d6064ac0400b2a2025-08-25T05:26:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-08-011210.3389/fmed.2025.15802341580234Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative studyMelanie Misamer0Claudia Bartels1Michael Belz2HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Göttingen, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyThe asymmetrical nature of the relationship between social workers and their clients may lead to abuse of power due to a human trait or corruption. A high level of power sensitivity is thus crucial to counteract power abuse. Ideally, this topic should be covered during studies, as the risk of corruption rises with everyday working life. In this study, we aimed to assess basic and specific aspects of power sensitivity both for 271 students and 414 professionals, covering (1) general differences for the total sample, (2) differences between both groups and (3) differences between subgroups (semesters, professional years, field of profession; ratings from 0 to 100%). While importance of power sensitivity (94.7%) and professional ethics/principles (91.9%) were rated higher than all other items (p < 0.001), a stark difference was found between the participants’ own vs. the anticipated professional groups’ power sensitivity (73.9% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001). A hypothetical individual change for the worse through the power as social worker was rated significantly lower than all other items on the respective scale (61.5%, p < 0.001). Professionals rated the experience of stereotypical ideas and prejudices towards clients (78.5, 75.2%) to be significantly stronger than students (69.4, 67.4% all p < 0.001). For students, power sensitivity generally increased with semesters (p < 0.001), while it remained stable over professional years for social workers. Differences between fields of profession did not reach significance. In summary, both students and professionals emphasized the importance of power sensitivity, but seemed to show a self-serving bias if they compared themselves to their group – considering a possible corruption effect, this may at least be interpreted as problematic. We discuss room for improvement in terms of sensitization, whether in the context of further training (professionals) or curricula (students).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1580234/fullpower sensitivityconstructive use of powerdestructive use of powersocial work professionalssocial work studentsself-serving bias |
| spellingShingle | Melanie Misamer Claudia Bartels Michael Belz Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study Frontiers in Medicine power sensitivity constructive use of power destructive use of power social work professionals social work students self-serving bias |
| title | Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study |
| title_full | Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study |
| title_fullStr | Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study |
| title_short | Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study |
| title_sort | aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students a comparative study |
| topic | power sensitivity constructive use of power destructive use of power social work professionals social work students self-serving bias |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1580234/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT melaniemisamer aspectsofpowersensitivityamongsocialworkersandsocialworkstudentsacomparativestudy AT claudiabartels aspectsofpowersensitivityamongsocialworkersandsocialworkstudentsacomparativestudy AT michaelbelz aspectsofpowersensitivityamongsocialworkersandsocialworkstudentsacomparativestudy |