Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges
Understanding the landscape of privacy protection in governmental systems is crucial for ensuring the trustworthiness of public services and safeguarding citizens’ sensitive data from breaches or misuse. Systematic mapping and synthesis of previous research can help identify existing priv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10879480/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849722826680958976 |
|---|---|
| author | Sidik Prabowo Aji Gautama Putrada Ikke Dian Oktaviani Maman Abdurohman Marijn Janssen Hilal Hudan Nuha Sarwono Sutikno |
| author_facet | Sidik Prabowo Aji Gautama Putrada Ikke Dian Oktaviani Maman Abdurohman Marijn Janssen Hilal Hudan Nuha Sarwono Sutikno |
| author_sort | Sidik Prabowo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Understanding the landscape of privacy protection in governmental systems is crucial for ensuring the trustworthiness of public services and safeguarding citizens’ sensitive data from breaches or misuse. Systematic mapping and synthesis of previous research can help identify existing privacy-preserving techniques, assess their effectiveness, and highlight areas for improvement, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners. We aim to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of privacy-preserving tools and technologies, focusing on their adoption and governments’ challenges. This study also uncovers emerging trends and future research directions, contributing to developing more robust privacy strategies tailored to government needs.Given its extensive reach and government-centric methodology, this evaluation distinguishes itself from previous research. Our work methodically synthesizes privacy-preserving tools and technologies from the distinct perspective of government roles, in contrast to previous assessments that concentrate narrowly on certain technologies or areas. Our findings offer a synthesis of the government’s diverse roles in privacy preservation—regulator, enforcer, user, and service provider—and address existing concerns and key privacy-related technologies. Finally, we identify significant research opportunities, such as improving privacy-preserving mechanisms to strengthen the integrity of public services and mitigate the risks of data breaches and misuse. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d78e4dddb05b48e89dba18402f4c56a0 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2169-3536 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Access |
| spelling | doaj-art-d78e4dddb05b48e89dba18402f4c56a02025-08-20T03:11:14ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-0113339043393410.1109/ACCESS.2025.354087810879480Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and ChallengesSidik Prabowo0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9960-387XAji Gautama Putrada1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-0177Ikke Dian Oktaviani2https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2094-6410Maman Abdurohman3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-5459Marijn Janssen4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-8790Hilal Hudan Nuha5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-6788Sarwono Sutikno6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-7240School of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, IndonesiaSchool of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, IndonesiaSchool of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, IndonesiaSchool of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, IndonesiaDelft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsSchool of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, IndonesiaSchool of Informatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung, IndonesiaUnderstanding the landscape of privacy protection in governmental systems is crucial for ensuring the trustworthiness of public services and safeguarding citizens’ sensitive data from breaches or misuse. Systematic mapping and synthesis of previous research can help identify existing privacy-preserving techniques, assess their effectiveness, and highlight areas for improvement, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners. We aim to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of privacy-preserving tools and technologies, focusing on their adoption and governments’ challenges. This study also uncovers emerging trends and future research directions, contributing to developing more robust privacy strategies tailored to government needs.Given its extensive reach and government-centric methodology, this evaluation distinguishes itself from previous research. Our work methodically synthesizes privacy-preserving tools and technologies from the distinct perspective of government roles, in contrast to previous assessments that concentrate narrowly on certain technologies or areas. Our findings offer a synthesis of the government’s diverse roles in privacy preservation—regulator, enforcer, user, and service provider—and address existing concerns and key privacy-related technologies. Finally, we identify significant research opportunities, such as improving privacy-preserving mechanisms to strengthen the integrity of public services and mitigate the risks of data breaches and misuse.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10879480/Privacyregulationprivacy-preserving mechanismsgovernmentsystematic literature study |
| spellingShingle | Sidik Prabowo Aji Gautama Putrada Ikke Dian Oktaviani Maman Abdurohman Marijn Janssen Hilal Hudan Nuha Sarwono Sutikno Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges IEEE Access Privacy regulation privacy-preserving mechanisms government systematic literature study |
| title | Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges |
| title_full | Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges |
| title_fullStr | Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges |
| title_full_unstemmed | Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges |
| title_short | Privacy-Preserving Tools and Technologies: Government Adoption and Challenges |
| title_sort | privacy preserving tools and technologies government adoption and challenges |
| topic | Privacy regulation privacy-preserving mechanisms government systematic literature study |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10879480/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sidikprabowo privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT ajigautamaputrada privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT ikkedianoktaviani privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT mamanabdurohman privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT marijnjanssen privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT hilalhudannuha privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges AT sarwonosutikno privacypreservingtoolsandtechnologiesgovernmentadoptionandchallenges |