Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques
Choosing appropriate locations for built-up growth while maintaining natural balance has become necessary for sustainable urban planning. To this end, two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches—the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP)—have been applied...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Geocarto International |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10106049.2024.2335249 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850245769489022976 |
|---|---|
| author | Nitin Liladhar Rane Saurabh Purushottam Choudhary Arjun Saha Aman Srivastava Chaitanya Baliram Pande Fahad Alshehri Ranjan Roy Okan Mert Katipoğlu Hazem Ghassan Abdo |
| author_facet | Nitin Liladhar Rane Saurabh Purushottam Choudhary Arjun Saha Aman Srivastava Chaitanya Baliram Pande Fahad Alshehri Ranjan Roy Okan Mert Katipoğlu Hazem Ghassan Abdo |
| author_sort | Nitin Liladhar Rane |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Choosing appropriate locations for built-up growth while maintaining natural balance has become necessary for sustainable urban planning. To this end, two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches—the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP)—have been applied in this work. The MIF model results show that 23.546% of the study region was very highly suitable for newly built-up areas, and 18.786% was restricted for urban settlement, whereas, in the AHP model, 28.907% of the area was highly suitable, 17.619% was restricted for urban settlement. Finally, the dependability and efficiency of the two models used for the study area were assessed through the receiver operating curve (ROC) and area under curve (AUC) analysis. The comparative analysis demonstrates that the MIF approach (AUC 0.817) is more suitable and reliable than the AHP (AUC 0.783). The present work provides new insights to integrate GIS tools with MCDM for practical urban land suitability assessment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d7522f8f7c67449facc7dbe26b993ae7 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1010-6049 1752-0762 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geocarto International |
| spelling | doaj-art-d7522f8f7c67449facc7dbe26b993ae72025-08-20T01:59:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGeocarto International1010-60491752-07622024-01-0139110.1080/10106049.2024.2335249Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniquesNitin Liladhar Rane0Saurabh Purushottam Choudhary1Arjun Saha2Aman Srivastava3Chaitanya Baliram Pande4Fahad Alshehri5Ranjan Roy6Okan Mert Katipoğlu7Hazem Ghassan Abdo8Architecture, Vivekanand Education Society’s College of Architecture (VESCOA), Mumbai, IndiaArchitecture, Vivekanand Education Society’s College of Architecture (VESCOA), Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Geography & Applied Geography, North Bengal University, Siliguri, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, IndiaNew Era and Development in Civil Engineering Research Group, Scientific Research Center, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, IraqAbdullah Alrushaid Chair for Earth Science Remote Sensing Research, Geology and Geophysics Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Geography & Applied Geography, North Bengal University, Siliguri, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, TürkiyeGeography Department, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Tartous University, Tartous, SyriaChoosing appropriate locations for built-up growth while maintaining natural balance has become necessary for sustainable urban planning. To this end, two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches—the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP)—have been applied in this work. The MIF model results show that 23.546% of the study region was very highly suitable for newly built-up areas, and 18.786% was restricted for urban settlement, whereas, in the AHP model, 28.907% of the area was highly suitable, 17.619% was restricted for urban settlement. Finally, the dependability and efficiency of the two models used for the study area were assessed through the receiver operating curve (ROC) and area under curve (AUC) analysis. The comparative analysis demonstrates that the MIF approach (AUC 0.817) is more suitable and reliable than the AHP (AUC 0.783). The present work provides new insights to integrate GIS tools with MCDM for practical urban land suitability assessment.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10106049.2024.2335249Urban settlementland suitabilityenvironmental sustainabilityGISmulti influencing factor (MIF)analytical hierarchy process (AHP) |
| spellingShingle | Nitin Liladhar Rane Saurabh Purushottam Choudhary Arjun Saha Aman Srivastava Chaitanya Baliram Pande Fahad Alshehri Ranjan Roy Okan Mert Katipoğlu Hazem Ghassan Abdo Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques Geocarto International Urban settlement land suitability environmental sustainability GIS multi influencing factor (MIF) analytical hierarchy process (AHP) |
| title | Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques |
| title_full | Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques |
| title_fullStr | Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques |
| title_full_unstemmed | Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques |
| title_short | Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques |
| title_sort | delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using gis based mif and ahp techniques |
| topic | Urban settlement land suitability environmental sustainability GIS multi influencing factor (MIF) analytical hierarchy process (AHP) |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10106049.2024.2335249 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nitinliladharrane delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT saurabhpurushottamchoudhary delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT arjunsaha delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT amansrivastava delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT chaitanyabalirampande delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT fahadalshehri delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT ranjanroy delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT okanmertkatipoglu delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques AT hazemghassanabdo delineationofenvironmentallysustainableurbansettlementusinggisbasedmifandahptechniques |