Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?

Within a context of broadening the principles of constitutionalism, we have seen the introduction of provisions recognising the inherent interests of animals in a growing number of constitutional texts. This relatively recent trend marks a limitation of legal anthropocentrism in two ways. Firstly,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olivier Le Bot
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya 2025-06-01
Series:Revista Catalana de Dret Públic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistes.eapc.gencat.cat/index.php/rcdp/article/view/4401
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849736275042500608
author Olivier Le Bot
author_facet Olivier Le Bot
author_sort Olivier Le Bot
collection DOAJ
description Within a context of broadening the principles of constitutionalism, we have seen the introduction of provisions recognising the inherent interests of animals in a growing number of constitutional texts. This relatively recent trend marks a limitation of legal anthropocentrism in two ways. Firstly, the relevant stipulations can be used as the basis for limiting core human interests, i.e. fundamental rights. Secondly, they could lead to restrictions on the evaluative capacity of public authorities in their relations with animals. Nevertheless, these provisions do not entail a break with legal anthropocentrism, as human interests continue to enjoy clear precedence over those of animals.
format Article
id doaj-art-d7497ddacc084b9fbeaff577675c9246
institution DOAJ
issn 1885-5709
1885-8252
language Catalan
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya
record_format Article
series Revista Catalana de Dret Públic
spelling doaj-art-d7497ddacc084b9fbeaff577675c92462025-08-20T03:07:20ZcatEscola d'Administració Pública de CatalunyaRevista Catalana de Dret Públic1885-57091885-82522025-06-017010.58992/rcdp.i70.2025.4401Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism? Olivier Le Bot Within a context of broadening the principles of constitutionalism, we have seen the introduction of provisions recognising the inherent interests of animals in a growing number of constitutional texts. This relatively recent trend marks a limitation of legal anthropocentrism in two ways. Firstly, the relevant stipulations can be used as the basis for limiting core human interests, i.e. fundamental rights. Secondly, they could lead to restrictions on the evaluative capacity of public authorities in their relations with animals. Nevertheless, these provisions do not entail a break with legal anthropocentrism, as human interests continue to enjoy clear precedence over those of animals. https://revistes.eapc.gencat.cat/index.php/rcdp/article/view/4401constitutionanimalfundamental rightswell-being
spellingShingle Olivier Le Bot
Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
Revista Catalana de Dret Públic
constitution
animal
fundamental rights
well-being
title Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
title_full Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
title_fullStr Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
title_short Constitutional law and animals: a break with legal anthropocentrism?
title_sort constitutional law and animals a break with legal anthropocentrism
topic constitution
animal
fundamental rights
well-being
url https://revistes.eapc.gencat.cat/index.php/rcdp/article/view/4401
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierlebot constitutionallawandanimalsabreakwithlegalanthropocentrism