Anatomy of the top 1% most highly cited publications: An empirical comparison of two approaches
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Antonio Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio J. Gomez-Nuñez, Carlos Olmeda-Gomez |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The MIT Press
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Quantitative Science Studies |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00290 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The top 100 most‐cited knee osteotomy publications
by: Matthieu Ollivier, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
The top 100 most cited articles in Australian orthopaedic surgery
by: Lachlan B. McMillan, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
The top 100 most cited publications on free gingival graft between 2000 and 2023: a bibliometric and visualized analysis
by: Miao Yu, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
The top 50 most cited articles on superior capsular reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis
by: Mallery Zeiman, BS, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
The top 10 most-cited articles on the management of fractured instruments: a bibliometric analysis
by: Lora Mishra, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)