Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits

Abstract Thermospheric mass density (TMD) measurements are invaluable to accurately estimate and predict the position and velocity of orbiting objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Existing observational methods and predictive models have some problems (e.g., accuracy, resolution, coverage, cost, etc.)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrés Calabia, Shuanggen Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002645
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536364198232064
author Andrés Calabia
Shuanggen Jin
author_facet Andrés Calabia
Shuanggen Jin
author_sort Andrés Calabia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Thermospheric mass density (TMD) measurements are invaluable to accurately estimate and predict the position and velocity of orbiting objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Existing observational methods and predictive models have some problems (e.g., accuracy, resolution, coverage, cost, etc.) to describe and forecast the actual air drag variations as required for practical applications. With the increasing number of LEO satellites equipped with high‐precision Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers, the precise orbits can be used to obtain non‐gravitational accelerations, and therefore estimate TMD variations. In this study, TMD is estimated from the precise orbits of CAScade SmallSat and IOnospheric Polar Explorer (CASSIOPE) at one‐second time step, and the TMD variations following the February 2014 geomagnetic storm are investigated. Using this method, a more detailed description than previous methods and empirical models is given with short‐term TMD variations during geomagnetic storm conditions. The empirical model NRLMSISE‐00 shows less pronounced and more averaged variations, while CASSIOPE‐derived TMD can reflect the abrupt disturbances triggered by the geomagnetic storm. CASSIOPE TMD shows a correlation of 72.4% to the merging electric field Em index, while the NRLMSISE‐00 model shows a correlation of 42.1%.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6fe90e3ae1041bda5bbbd55204f197c
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-d6fe90e3ae1041bda5bbbd55204f197c2025-01-14T16:31:28ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-04-01194n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002645Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise OrbitsAndrés Calabia0Shuanggen Jin1School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing ChinaSchool of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing ChinaAbstract Thermospheric mass density (TMD) measurements are invaluable to accurately estimate and predict the position and velocity of orbiting objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Existing observational methods and predictive models have some problems (e.g., accuracy, resolution, coverage, cost, etc.) to describe and forecast the actual air drag variations as required for practical applications. With the increasing number of LEO satellites equipped with high‐precision Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers, the precise orbits can be used to obtain non‐gravitational accelerations, and therefore estimate TMD variations. In this study, TMD is estimated from the precise orbits of CAScade SmallSat and IOnospheric Polar Explorer (CASSIOPE) at one‐second time step, and the TMD variations following the February 2014 geomagnetic storm are investigated. Using this method, a more detailed description than previous methods and empirical models is given with short‐term TMD variations during geomagnetic storm conditions. The empirical model NRLMSISE‐00 shows less pronounced and more averaged variations, while CASSIOPE‐derived TMD can reflect the abrupt disturbances triggered by the geomagnetic storm. CASSIOPE TMD shows a correlation of 72.4% to the merging electric field Em index, while the NRLMSISE‐00 model shows a correlation of 42.1%.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002645CASSIOPEGlobal Navigation Satellite Systemlow earth orbitthermospheric mass densityupper‐atmosphere
spellingShingle Andrés Calabia
Shuanggen Jin
Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
Space Weather
CASSIOPE
Global Navigation Satellite System
low earth orbit
thermospheric mass density
upper‐atmosphere
title Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
title_full Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
title_fullStr Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
title_full_unstemmed Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
title_short Upper‐Atmosphere Mass Density Variations From CASSIOPE Precise Orbits
title_sort upper atmosphere mass density variations from cassiope precise orbits
topic CASSIOPE
Global Navigation Satellite System
low earth orbit
thermospheric mass density
upper‐atmosphere
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002645
work_keys_str_mv AT andrescalabia upperatmospheremassdensityvariationsfromcassiopepreciseorbits
AT shuanggenjin upperatmospheremassdensityvariationsfromcassiopepreciseorbits