Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a significant and growing concern, with a prevalence of 2–3% in individuals aged over 65 years. Moreover, with an aging global population, the prevalence is anticipated to double by 2050. Indeed, AS can arise from various etiologies, including calcific trileaflets, congenital...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomoyo Hamana, Teruo Sekimoto, Aloke V. Finn, Renu Virmani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2025-04-01
Series:Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/4/10.31083/RCM28185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849310692757209088
author Tomoyo Hamana
Teruo Sekimoto
Aloke V. Finn
Renu Virmani
author_facet Tomoyo Hamana
Teruo Sekimoto
Aloke V. Finn
Renu Virmani
author_sort Tomoyo Hamana
collection DOAJ
description Aortic stenosis (AS) is a significant and growing concern, with a prevalence of 2–3% in individuals aged over 65 years. Moreover, with an aging global population, the prevalence is anticipated to double by 2050. Indeed, AS can arise from various etiologies, including calcific trileaflets, congenital valve abnormalities (e.g., bicuspid and unicuspid valves), and post-rheumatic, whereby each has a distinct influence that shapes the onset and progression of the disease. The normal aortic valve has a trilaminar structure comprising the fibrosa, spongiosa, and ventricularis, which work together to maintain its function. In calcific AS, the disease begins with early calcification starting in high mechanical stress areas of the valve and progresses slowly over decades, eventually leading to extensive calcification resulting in impaired valve function. This process involves mechanisms similar to atherosclerosis, including lipid deposition, chronic inflammation, and mineralization. The progression of calcific AS is strongly associated with aging, with additional risk factors including male gender, smoking, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome exacerbating the condition. Conversely, congenital forms of AS, such as bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves, result in an earlier disease onset, typically 10–20 years earlier than that observed in patients with a normal tricuspid aortic valve. Rheumatic AS, although less common in developed countries due to effective antibiotic treatments, also exhibits age-related characteristics, with an earlier onset in individuals who experienced rheumatic fever in their youth. The only curative therapies currently available are surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, these options are sometimes too invasive for older patients; thus, management of AS, particularly in older patients, requires a comprehensive approach that considers age, disease severity, comorbidities, frailty, and each patient’s individual needs. Although the valves used in TAVR demonstrate promising midterm durability, long-term data are still required, especially when used in younger individuals, usually with low surgical risk. Moreover, understanding the causes and mechanisms of structural valve deterioration is crucial for appropriate treatment selections, including valve selection and pharmacological therapy, since this knowledge is essential for optimizing the lifelong management of AS.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6e1915a50184366bda59fb46e50c0b3
institution Kabale University
issn 1530-6550
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d6e1915a50184366bda59fb46e50c0b32025-08-20T03:53:39ZengIMR PressReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine1530-65502025-04-012642818510.31083/RCM28185S1530-6550(25)01754-5Age Differences in Aortic StenosisTomoyo Hamana0Teruo Sekimoto1Aloke V. Finn2Renu Virmani3CVPath Institute, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USACVPath Institute, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USACVPath Institute, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USACVPath Institute, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USAAortic stenosis (AS) is a significant and growing concern, with a prevalence of 2–3% in individuals aged over 65 years. Moreover, with an aging global population, the prevalence is anticipated to double by 2050. Indeed, AS can arise from various etiologies, including calcific trileaflets, congenital valve abnormalities (e.g., bicuspid and unicuspid valves), and post-rheumatic, whereby each has a distinct influence that shapes the onset and progression of the disease. The normal aortic valve has a trilaminar structure comprising the fibrosa, spongiosa, and ventricularis, which work together to maintain its function. In calcific AS, the disease begins with early calcification starting in high mechanical stress areas of the valve and progresses slowly over decades, eventually leading to extensive calcification resulting in impaired valve function. This process involves mechanisms similar to atherosclerosis, including lipid deposition, chronic inflammation, and mineralization. The progression of calcific AS is strongly associated with aging, with additional risk factors including male gender, smoking, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome exacerbating the condition. Conversely, congenital forms of AS, such as bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves, result in an earlier disease onset, typically 10–20 years earlier than that observed in patients with a normal tricuspid aortic valve. Rheumatic AS, although less common in developed countries due to effective antibiotic treatments, also exhibits age-related characteristics, with an earlier onset in individuals who experienced rheumatic fever in their youth. The only curative therapies currently available are surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, these options are sometimes too invasive for older patients; thus, management of AS, particularly in older patients, requires a comprehensive approach that considers age, disease severity, comorbidities, frailty, and each patient’s individual needs. Although the valves used in TAVR demonstrate promising midterm durability, long-term data are still required, especially when used in younger individuals, usually with low surgical risk. Moreover, understanding the causes and mechanisms of structural valve deterioration is crucial for appropriate treatment selections, including valve selection and pharmacological therapy, since this knowledge is essential for optimizing the lifelong management of AS.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/4/10.31083/RCM28185aortic stenosiscalcific aortic valve diseasebioprosthetic valve failure
spellingShingle Tomoyo Hamana
Teruo Sekimoto
Aloke V. Finn
Renu Virmani
Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
aortic stenosis
calcific aortic valve disease
bioprosthetic valve failure
title Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
title_full Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
title_fullStr Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
title_short Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis
title_sort age differences in aortic stenosis
topic aortic stenosis
calcific aortic valve disease
bioprosthetic valve failure
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/4/10.31083/RCM28185
work_keys_str_mv AT tomoyohamana agedifferencesinaorticstenosis
AT teruosekimoto agedifferencesinaorticstenosis
AT alokevfinn agedifferencesinaorticstenosis
AT renuvirmani agedifferencesinaorticstenosis