Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives

ABSTRACT Objectives Although computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has increased significantly the precision of dental implant placement, documentation of the impact of such technologies in the patient‐reported experience and outcomes remains, however, limited. The aim of this white paper was to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Hui Yeo, Lin Jing Uei, Man Yi, Kajorn Kungsadalpipob, Keskanya Subbalehka, Bilal Al‐Nawas, Nikos Mattheos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70143
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405092945461248
author Xin Hui Yeo
Lin Jing Uei
Man Yi
Kajorn Kungsadalpipob
Keskanya Subbalehka
Bilal Al‐Nawas
Nikos Mattheos
author_facet Xin Hui Yeo
Lin Jing Uei
Man Yi
Kajorn Kungsadalpipob
Keskanya Subbalehka
Bilal Al‐Nawas
Nikos Mattheos
author_sort Xin Hui Yeo
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objectives Although computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has increased significantly the precision of dental implant placement, documentation of the impact of such technologies in the patient‐reported experience and outcomes remains, however, limited. The aim of this white paper was to assess the impact of CAIS on key aspects of the patient experience, such as its potential benefits on (1) patients' understanding and engagement with implant surgery, (2) patient's confidence with treatment outcomes, (3) patients' preferences, (4) intra‐ and (5) Postoperative experience and (6) long‐term patient‐reported outcomes and oral health‐related quality of life. Material and Methods A review of the literature compiled existing evidence from clinical studies up to November 2024, which was later discussed and synthesized with expert opinions and the best currently documented experience and practice. Results No evidence was found that CAIS improves patient engagement or confidence with treatment outcomes, while comparative studies showed no difference in the intra‐ and postoperative experience when CAIS is used. Impact of the cost of CAIS procedures on patients perceptions and preferences has also not been explored, with the majority of studies significantly subsidizing patient costs, in particular randomized trials. At the same time, studies that compare interventions cannot assess the overall benefits of a complex workflow such as immediacy or minimally invasive approaches, to which CAIS is an essential part. Conclusions Research on patient outcomes with CAIS might not fully reflect the potential of these technologies when limited to the level of the surgical intervention. Major anticipated benefits of CAIS for the patient such as the potential to reduce complexity and facilitate faster, safer and more predictable execution of digitally designed treatments, could be better approached in the future by studies aimed at assessing patient‐reported outcomes from entire treatment workflows.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6d0af1f670f46cdb1c7d5edd39efd96
institution Kabale University
issn 2057-4347
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
spelling doaj-art-d6d0af1f670f46cdb1c7d5edd39efd962025-08-20T03:36:45ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472025-06-01113n/an/a10.1002/cre2.70143Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and PerspectivesXin Hui Yeo0Lin Jing Uei1Man Yi2Kajorn Kungsadalpipob3Keskanya Subbalehka4Bilal Al‐Nawas5Nikos Mattheos6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University Bangkok ThailandDepartment of Stomotology Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia‐Yi Christian Hospital Chia‐Yi TaiwanState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan ChinaDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University Bangkok ThailandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University Bangkok ThailandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University Medical Center Mainz Mainz GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University Bangkok ThailandABSTRACT Objectives Although computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has increased significantly the precision of dental implant placement, documentation of the impact of such technologies in the patient‐reported experience and outcomes remains, however, limited. The aim of this white paper was to assess the impact of CAIS on key aspects of the patient experience, such as its potential benefits on (1) patients' understanding and engagement with implant surgery, (2) patient's confidence with treatment outcomes, (3) patients' preferences, (4) intra‐ and (5) Postoperative experience and (6) long‐term patient‐reported outcomes and oral health‐related quality of life. Material and Methods A review of the literature compiled existing evidence from clinical studies up to November 2024, which was later discussed and synthesized with expert opinions and the best currently documented experience and practice. Results No evidence was found that CAIS improves patient engagement or confidence with treatment outcomes, while comparative studies showed no difference in the intra‐ and postoperative experience when CAIS is used. Impact of the cost of CAIS procedures on patients perceptions and preferences has also not been explored, with the majority of studies significantly subsidizing patient costs, in particular randomized trials. At the same time, studies that compare interventions cannot assess the overall benefits of a complex workflow such as immediacy or minimally invasive approaches, to which CAIS is an essential part. Conclusions Research on patient outcomes with CAIS might not fully reflect the potential of these technologies when limited to the level of the surgical intervention. Major anticipated benefits of CAIS for the patient such as the potential to reduce complexity and facilitate faster, safer and more predictable execution of digitally designed treatments, could be better approached in the future by studies aimed at assessing patient‐reported outcomes from entire treatment workflows.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70143CAISdental implantsguided surgerypatient‐reported outcomesPREMPROM
spellingShingle Xin Hui Yeo
Lin Jing Uei
Man Yi
Kajorn Kungsadalpipob
Keskanya Subbalehka
Bilal Al‐Nawas
Nikos Mattheos
Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
CAIS
dental implants
guided surgery
patient‐reported outcomes
PREM
PROM
title Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
title_full Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
title_fullStr Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
title_short Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives
title_sort computer assisted implant surgery patients experience and perspectives
topic CAIS
dental implants
guided surgery
patient‐reported outcomes
PREM
PROM
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70143
work_keys_str_mv AT xinhuiyeo computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT linjinguei computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT manyi computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT kajornkungsadalpipob computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT keskanyasubbalehka computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT bilalalnawas computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives
AT nikosmattheos computerassistedimplantsurgerypatientsexperienceandperspectives