How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter

Background: Tele-intervention gained popularity, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prompting healthcare providers to adapt to remote service delivery. Research about stuttering treatment via tele-intervention in South Africa is limited. Speech-language therapists (SLTs) requir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raadhiyah Hoosain, Shabnam Abdoola, Esedra Krüger, Bhavani Pillay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2025-01-01
Series:South African Journal of Communication Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/1068
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858227741196288
author Raadhiyah Hoosain
Shabnam Abdoola
Esedra Krüger
Bhavani Pillay
author_facet Raadhiyah Hoosain
Shabnam Abdoola
Esedra Krüger
Bhavani Pillay
author_sort Raadhiyah Hoosain
collection DOAJ
description Background: Tele-intervention gained popularity, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prompting healthcare providers to adapt to remote service delivery. Research about stuttering treatment via tele-intervention in South Africa is limited. Speech-language therapists (SLTs) require further insights to deliver a well-supported approach for treatment of stuttering using tele-intervention, despite limitations such as technological disruptions, including loadshedding, that impact service reliability. Objectives: The study aims to explore clients’ experiences with tele-intervention for stuttering therapy, and to provide recommendations to improve service delivery. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 persons who stutter (PWS) recruited through purposive sampling. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants with experience in both tele-intervention and in-person treatment. Inductive thematic analysis supplemented by descriptive statistics was used to identify patterns and trends. Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) User experiences and factors shaping perceptions of tele-intervention; (2) technical infrastructure: barriers and facilitators; (3) financial and access considerations and (4) in-person treatment experience compared to tele-intervention user experience. Likert scale ratings indicated no considerable difference in preferences between tele-intervention and in-person treatment. Conclusion: Participants’ diverse experiences highlighted tele-intervention’s benefits and challenges for stuttering therapy. While limitations exist, findings inform service enhancement in South Africa, emphasising the importance of users’ perspectives in tele-intervention design. Contribution: Insights from PWS can be used in informing clinical practice, aiding SLTs in meeting the needs of PWS and guiding best practice. Tele-intervention should be integrated into a hybrid intervention model that PWS prefer.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6c67dd8f1b840f5bf63a0d6186af006
institution Kabale University
issn 0379-8046
2225-4765
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Communication Disorders
spelling doaj-art-d6c67dd8f1b840f5bf63a0d6186af0062025-02-11T13:27:20ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Communication Disorders0379-80462225-47652025-01-01721e1e910.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1068766How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutterRaadhiyah Hoosain0Shabnam Abdoola1Esedra Krüger2Bhavani Pillay3Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, PretoriaDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; and Department of Speech-Language Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, Al AinDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, PretoriaDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, PretoriaBackground: Tele-intervention gained popularity, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prompting healthcare providers to adapt to remote service delivery. Research about stuttering treatment via tele-intervention in South Africa is limited. Speech-language therapists (SLTs) require further insights to deliver a well-supported approach for treatment of stuttering using tele-intervention, despite limitations such as technological disruptions, including loadshedding, that impact service reliability. Objectives: The study aims to explore clients’ experiences with tele-intervention for stuttering therapy, and to provide recommendations to improve service delivery. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 persons who stutter (PWS) recruited through purposive sampling. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants with experience in both tele-intervention and in-person treatment. Inductive thematic analysis supplemented by descriptive statistics was used to identify patterns and trends. Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) User experiences and factors shaping perceptions of tele-intervention; (2) technical infrastructure: barriers and facilitators; (3) financial and access considerations and (4) in-person treatment experience compared to tele-intervention user experience. Likert scale ratings indicated no considerable difference in preferences between tele-intervention and in-person treatment. Conclusion: Participants’ diverse experiences highlighted tele-intervention’s benefits and challenges for stuttering therapy. While limitations exist, findings inform service enhancement in South Africa, emphasising the importance of users’ perspectives in tele-intervention design. Contribution: Insights from PWS can be used in informing clinical practice, aiding SLTs in meeting the needs of PWS and guiding best practice. Tele-intervention should be integrated into a hybrid intervention model that PWS prefer.https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/1068dysfluencypersons who stutterspeech therapystutteringtele-interventionspeech-language therapistperspectiveshybrid intervention
spellingShingle Raadhiyah Hoosain
Shabnam Abdoola
Esedra Krüger
Bhavani Pillay
How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
South African Journal of Communication Disorders
dysfluency
persons who stutter
speech therapy
stuttering
tele-intervention
speech-language therapist
perspectives
hybrid intervention
title How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
title_full How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
title_fullStr How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
title_full_unstemmed How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
title_short How I experienced tele-intervention: Qualitative insights from persons who stutter
title_sort how i experienced tele intervention qualitative insights from persons who stutter
topic dysfluency
persons who stutter
speech therapy
stuttering
tele-intervention
speech-language therapist
perspectives
hybrid intervention
url https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/1068
work_keys_str_mv AT raadhiyahhoosain howiexperiencedteleinterventionqualitativeinsightsfrompersonswhostutter
AT shabnamabdoola howiexperiencedteleinterventionqualitativeinsightsfrompersonswhostutter
AT esedrakruger howiexperiencedteleinterventionqualitativeinsightsfrompersonswhostutter
AT bhavanipillay howiexperiencedteleinterventionqualitativeinsightsfrompersonswhostutter