Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment

Abstract California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Win Cowger, Itzel Gomez, Norma Martinez‐Rubin, Ann Moriarty, Todd Harwell, Lisa Anich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Community Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022CSJ000017
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850235574591422464
author Win Cowger
Itzel Gomez
Norma Martinez‐Rubin
Ann Moriarty
Todd Harwell
Lisa Anich
author_facet Win Cowger
Itzel Gomez
Norma Martinez‐Rubin
Ann Moriarty
Todd Harwell
Lisa Anich
author_sort Win Cowger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for the community. The key scientific questions were: how much trash was in the creek at the time of the study, what types of trash were most abundant, and where should the community be most concerned about trash in the creek? The team enlisted additional community volunteers at local events. A randomized sampling design and a community science‐adapted version of The San Francisco Estuary Institute's Trash Monitoring Playbook was used to survey the trash in the creek. The Thriving Earth Team estimated there were 37 m3 and 47,820 pieces of total trash in the creek channel with an average concentration of 2 m3 per km and 2,697 pieces per km. The community gained an understanding of the scale of the problem. Plastic and single‐use trash were most abundant, and the community members expressed high concern about plastic single‐use food packaging and tobacco‐related waste. The community identified locations in the creek where trash was abundant and prioritized follow‐up study locations. Seven new recommendations were presented to the Pinole City Council. The City Council unanimously voted to further discuss ordinance‐related recommendations. And that was when community science contributed to local policy development.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6a9b127047d423b9408bb09c53335d2
institution OA Journals
issn 2692-9430
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Community Science
spelling doaj-art-d6a9b127047d423b9408bb09c53335d22025-08-20T02:02:12ZengWileyCommunity Science2692-94302023-03-0121n/an/a10.1029/2022CSJ000017Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter AssessmentWin Cowger0Itzel Gomez1Norma Martinez‐Rubin2Ann Moriarty3Todd Harwell4Lisa Anich5Moore Institute for Plastic Pollution Research Long Beach CA USAEarthTeam Richmond CA USAPinole Creek Thriving Earth Exchange Pinole CA USAFriends of Pinole Creek Watershed Board of Directors Pinole CA USAThriving Earth Exchange American Geophysical Union Washington DC USAContra Costa Resource Conservation District Concord CA USAAbstract California is one of the only states actively managing trash in its rivers. Several community groups in Pinole, CA, USA collaborated on a Thriving Earth Exchange community science project. Its purpose was to assess the trash in Pinole Creek and identify policy development opportunities for the community. The key scientific questions were: how much trash was in the creek at the time of the study, what types of trash were most abundant, and where should the community be most concerned about trash in the creek? The team enlisted additional community volunteers at local events. A randomized sampling design and a community science‐adapted version of The San Francisco Estuary Institute's Trash Monitoring Playbook was used to survey the trash in the creek. The Thriving Earth Team estimated there were 37 m3 and 47,820 pieces of total trash in the creek channel with an average concentration of 2 m3 per km and 2,697 pieces per km. The community gained an understanding of the scale of the problem. Plastic and single‐use trash were most abundant, and the community members expressed high concern about plastic single‐use food packaging and tobacco‐related waste. The community identified locations in the creek where trash was abundant and prioritized follow‐up study locations. Seven new recommendations were presented to the Pinole City Council. The City Council unanimously voted to further discuss ordinance‐related recommendations. And that was when community science contributed to local policy development.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022CSJ000017Thriving Earth Exchangelittertrashwater qualityplastic pollutionassessment
spellingShingle Win Cowger
Itzel Gomez
Norma Martinez‐Rubin
Ann Moriarty
Todd Harwell
Lisa Anich
Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
Community Science
Thriving Earth Exchange
litter
trash
water quality
plastic pollution
assessment
title Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
title_full Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
title_fullStr Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
title_short Community Science‐Informed Local Policy: A Case Study in Pinole Creek Litter Assessment
title_sort community science informed local policy a case study in pinole creek litter assessment
topic Thriving Earth Exchange
litter
trash
water quality
plastic pollution
assessment
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022CSJ000017
work_keys_str_mv AT wincowger communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment
AT itzelgomez communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment
AT normamartinezrubin communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment
AT annmoriarty communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment
AT toddharwell communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment
AT lisaanich communityscienceinformedlocalpolicyacasestudyinpinolecreeklitterassessment